Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHackneyCazenove Ward wardE5 9BXRAYMOR COURT, 91 Upper Clapton Road, Hackney, London, E5 9BX2004/0920
Planning application · Hackney

2004/0920.

RAYMOR COURT, 91 Upper Clapton Road, Hackney, London, E5 9BX

Licences & Notifications at RAYMOR COURT, 91 Upper Clapton Road, Hackney, London, E5 9BX, received 4 May 2004 — not required on 29 Jun 2004 (delegated, Anna Sinnott).

HackneyCazenove WardE5 9BX2004/0920
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Not required
Outcome
29 Jun 2004
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
3
Documents
3 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Resiting of two telephone kiosks.

Reference
2004/0920
Type
Prior Telecommunications Notice
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
4 May 2004
Target date
29 Jun 2004
Decision date
29 Jun 2004
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Reference
2004/0920
Type
Prior Telecommunications Notice
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
4 May 2004
Target date
29 Jun 2004
Decision date
29 Jun 2004
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
2004/0920 Planning -
2004/0920 Planning -
2004/0920 Planning -
2004/0920 Planning -
2004/0920 Planning -
2004/0920 Planning -

Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Not required on 29 Jun 2004, delegated decision by Anna Sinnott — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
4 May 2004
Application received
29 Jun 2004
Statutory target date
29 Jun 2004
Delegated decision: Not required · Anna Sinnott
4 May 2004
Application received
29 Jun 2004
Statutory target date
29 Jun 2004
Delegated decision: Not required · Anna Sinnott

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.