Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHackneyHoxton (R) wardN1 6EFCable & Wireless Global, MERCURY HOUSE, 32 - 43 Chart Street, Hackney, London, N1 6EF2005/2694
Planning application · Hackney

2005/2694.

Cable & Wireless Global, MERCURY HOUSE, 32 - 43 Chart Street, Hackney, London, N1 6EF

Lawful Development Certificate at Cable & Wireless Global, MERCURY HOUSE, 32 - 43 Chart Street, Hackney, London, N1 6EF, received 11 Nov 2005 — withdrawn on 11 Apr 2006 (delegated, Tyler Sharratt).

HackneyHoxton (R)N1 6EF2005/2694
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Withdrawn
Outcome
11 Apr 2006
22 wks
Decision time
14 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Certificate of lawfulness for proposed installation of 2x 1.87m high satellite dishes at roof level.

Reference
2005/2694
Type
Certificate of Lawful Development Existing/Proposed
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
11 Nov 2005
Target date
6 Jan 2006
Decision date
11 Apr 2006
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Final Decision
Reference
2005/2694
Type
Certificate of Lawful Development Existing/Proposed
Show all 16 rows
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
11 Nov 2005
Target date
6 Jan 2006
Decision date
11 Apr 2006
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Final Decision
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Withdrawn on 11 Apr 2006, delegated decision by Tyler Sharratt — 22 weeks from submission (14 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
11 Nov 2005
Application received
6 Jan 2006
Statutory target date
11 Apr 2006
Delegated decision: Withdrawn · Tyler Sharratt
11 Nov 2005
Application received
6 Jan 2006
Statutory target date
11 Apr 2006
Delegated decision: Withdrawn · Tyler Sharratt

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.