Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHackneyDalston Ward wardE8 1DGBURDON COURT, 8 Clifton Grove, Hackney, London, E8 1DG2005/2845
Planning application · Hackney

2005/2845.

BURDON COURT, 8 Clifton Grove, Hackney, London, E8 1DG

Full / Other Planning at BURDON COURT, 8 Clifton Grove, Hackney, London, E8 1DG, received 2 Dec 2005 — refused on 13 Jun 2006 (delegated, James Walker).

HackneyDalston WardE8 1DG2005/2845
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Refused
Outcome
13 Jun 2006
28 wks
Decision time
20 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
3
Documents
3 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Retention of a Satellite dish at second floor level.

Reference
2005/2845
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
2 Dec 2005
Validated
24 Apr 2006
Target date
19 Jun 2006
Decision date
13 Jun 2006
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Reference
2005/2845
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 17 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
2 Dec 2005
Validated
24 Apr 2006
Target date
19 Jun 2006
Decision date
13 Jun 2006
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
2005/2845 Planning -
2005/2845 Planning -
2005/2845 Planning -
2005/2845 Planning -
2005/2845 Planning -
2005/2845 Planning -

Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 13 Jun 2006, delegated decision by James Walker — 28 weeks from submission (20 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
2 Dec 2005
Application received
24 Apr 2006
Application validated
19 Jun 2006
Statutory target date
13 Jun 2006
Delegated decision: Refused · James Walker
2 Dec 2005
Application received
24 Apr 2006
Application validated
19 Jun 2006
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
13 Jun 2006
Delegated decision: Refused · James Walker

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.