Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Hackney›…Victoria Ward wardE9 7HR23 Gore Road, Hackney, London, E9 7HR›2006/0728
Planning application · Hackney

2006/0728.

23 Gore Road, Hackney, London, E9 7HR

Trees at 23 Gore Road, Hackney, London, E9 7HR, received 2 Mar 2006 — approved on 24 Apr 2006 (delegated, Nick Jacobs).

Hackney›Victoria Ward›E9 7HR›2006/0728
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Approved
Outcome
24 Apr 2006
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
2
Documents
2 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Works to 2x Maple trees at the front and a cherry tree to the side of the main building.

Reference
2006/0728
Type
Works to a Tree in Conservation Area Notification
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
2 Mar 2006
Target date
27 Apr 2006
Decision date
24 Apr 2006
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Premises record
Council register
Reference
2006/0728
Type
Works to a Tree in Conservation Area Notification
Site
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
2 Mar 2006
Target date
27 Apr 2006
Decision date
24 Apr 2006
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
2006/0728 Planning -
—
2006/0728 Planning -
—
2006/0728 Planning -
—
2006/0728 Planning -
—

Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 24 Apr 2006, delegated decision by Nick Jacobs — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
2 Mar 2006
Application received
27 Apr 2006
Statutory target date
24 Apr 2006
Delegated decision: Approved · Nick Jacobs
2 Mar 2006
Application received
27 Apr 2006
Statutory target date
24 Apr 2006
Delegated decision: Approved · Nick Jacobs

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.