Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHackneyHoxton (R) wardN1 7LTCATHERWOOD COURT Murray Grove, Hackney, London, N1 7LT2006/1288
Planning application · Hackney

2006/1288.

CATHERWOOD COURT Murray Grove, Hackney, London, N1 7LT

Discharge of Conditions at CATHERWOOD COURT Murray Grove, Hackney, London, N1 7LT, received 5 May 2006 — approved on 23 Jan 2007 (delegated, Rokos Frangos).

HackneyHoxton (R)N1 7LT2006/1288
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Approved
Outcome
23 Jan 2007
38 wks
Decision time
30 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
1
Documents
1 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Submission of details required by conditions 4 (entrance gate details )10 visibility at site entrance) and 14 dustbin enclosures) of planning permission 2004 /1006.

Reference
2006/1288
Type
Discharge of Condition
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
5 May 2006
Target date
30 Jun 2006
Decision date
23 Jan 2007
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Reference
2006/1288
Type
Discharge of Condition
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
5 May 2006
Target date
30 Jun 2006
Decision date
23 Jan 2007
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
2006/1288 Planning -
2006/1288 Planning -

Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 23 Jan 2007, delegated decision by Rokos Frangos — 38 weeks from submission (30 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
5 May 2006
Application received
30 Jun 2006
Statutory target date
23 Jan 2007
Delegated decision: Approved · Rokos Frangos
5 May 2006
Application received
30 Jun 2006
Statutory target date
23 Jan 2007
Delegated decision: Approved · Rokos Frangos

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.