Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHackneyDalston Ward wardE8 2NH2006/1300
Planning application · Hackney

2006/1300.

Tfc Dalston Ltd, 89 Ridley Road, Hackney, London, E8 2NH

Full / Other Planning at Tfc Dalston Ltd, 89 Ridley Road, Hackney, London, E8 2NH, received 5 May 2006 — refused on 24 Jul 2006 (delegated, Raymond Okot).

HackneyDalston WardE8 2NH2006/1300
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Refused
Outcome
24 Jul 2006
11 wks
Decision time
3 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
2
Documents
2 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Installation of a ATM.

Reference
2006/1300
Type
Full Planning Permission
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
5 May 2006
Validated
29 May 2006
Target date
24 Jul 2006
Decision date
24 Jul 2006
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Reference
2006/1300
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
5 May 2006
Validated
29 May 2006
Target date
24 Jul 2006
Decision date
24 Jul 2006
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
2006/1300 Planning -
2006/1300 Planning -
2006/1300 Planning -
2006/1300 Planning -

Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 24 Jul 2006, delegated decision by Raymond Okot — 11 weeks from submission (3 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
5 May 2006
Application received
29 May 2006
Application validated
24 Jul 2006
Statutory target date
24 Jul 2006
Delegated decision: Refused · Raymond Okot
5 May 2006
Application received
29 May 2006
Application validated
24 Jul 2006
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
24 Jul 2006
Delegated decision: Refused · Raymond Okot

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.