Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHackneySpringfield Ward wardE5 9EP25 Moreton Close, Hackney, London, E5 9EP2007/0151
Planning application · Hackney

2007/0151.

25 Moreton Close, Hackney, London, E5 9EP

Full / Other Planning at 25 Moreton Close, Hackney, London, E5 9EP, received 11 Jan 2007 — approved on 8 Mar 2007 (delegated, Elizabeth Hindle).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Approved
Outcome
8 Mar 2007
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
5
Documents
5 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Replace existing windows and doors with new UPVC windows and doors.

Reference
2007/0151
Type
Councils Own Development Regulation 3
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
11 Jan 2007
Target date
8 Mar 2007
Decision date
8 Mar 2007
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Reference
2007/0151
Type
Councils Own Development Regulation 3
Show all 16 rows
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
11 Jan 2007
Target date
8 Mar 2007
Decision date
8 Mar 2007
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
2007/0151 Planning -
2007/0151 Planning -
2007/0151 Planning -
2007/0151 Planning -
2007/0151 Planning -
2007/0151 Planning -
2007/0151 Planning -
2007/0151 Planning -
Show all 5 rows
2007/0151 Planning -
2007/0151 Planning -

Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 8 Mar 2007, delegated decision by Elizabeth Hindle — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
11 Jan 2007
Application received
8 Mar 2007
Statutory target date
8 Mar 2007
Delegated decision: Approved · Elizabeth Hindle
11 Jan 2007
Application received
8 Mar 2007
Statutory target date
8 Mar 2007
Delegated decision: Approved · Elizabeth Hindle

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.