Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Hackney›…Dalston Ward wardE8 4AE›2007/0245
Planning application · Hackney

2007/0245.

492 Kingsland Road, Hackney, London, E8 4AE

Full / Other Planning at 492 Kingsland Road, Hackney, London, E8 4AE, received 23 Jan 2007 — refused on 20 Mar 2007 (delegated, Elizabeth Hindle).

Hackney›Dalston Ward›E8 4AE›2007/0245
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Refused
Outcome
20 Mar 2007
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
4
Documents
4 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Installation of ATM within shopfront

Reference
2007/0245
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
23 Jan 2007
Target date
20 Mar 2007
Decision date
20 Mar 2007
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Council register
Reference
2007/0245
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
23 Jan 2007
Target date
20 Mar 2007
Decision date
20 Mar 2007
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
2007/0245 Planning -
—
2007/0245 Planning -
—
2007/0245 Planning -
—
2007/0245 Planning -
—
2007/0245 Planning -
—
2007/0245 Planning -
—
2007/0245 Planning -
—
Show all 4 rows
2007/0245 Planning -
—

Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 20 Mar 2007, delegated decision by Elizabeth Hindle — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
23 Jan 2007
Application received
20 Mar 2007
Statutory target date
20 Mar 2007
Delegated decision: Refused · Elizabeth Hindle
23 Jan 2007
Application received
20 Mar 2007
Statutory target date
20 Mar 2007
Delegated decision: Refused · Elizabeth Hindle

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.