Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHackneyDalston Ward wardE8 2NR2007/2115
Planning application · Hackney

2007/2115.

Adom Trading, 88 Ridley Road, Hackney, London, E8 2NR

Advertisement at Adom Trading, 88 Ridley Road, Hackney, London, E8 2NR, received 15 Aug 2007 — refused on 10 Oct 2007 (delegated, Graham Callam).

HackneyDalston WardE8 2NR2007/2115
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Refused
Outcome
10 Oct 2007
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
6
Documents
6 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Retention of an internally illuminated sign to an ATM

Reference
2007/2115
Type
Advertisement Consent
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
15 Aug 2007
Target date
10 Oct 2007
Decision date
10 Oct 2007
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Reference
2007/2115
Type
Advertisement Consent
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
15 Aug 2007
Target date
10 Oct 2007
Decision date
10 Oct 2007
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
2007/2115 Planning -
2007/2115 Planning -
2007/2115 Planning -
2007/2115 Planning -
2007/2115 Planning -
2007/2115 Planning -
2007/2115 Planning -
2007/2115 Planning -
2007/2115 Planning -
Show all 6 rows
2007/2115 Planning -
2007/2115 Planning -
2007/2115 Planning -

Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 10 Oct 2007, delegated decision by Graham Callam — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
15 Aug 2007
Application received
10 Oct 2007
Statutory target date
10 Oct 2007
Delegated decision: Refused · Graham Callam
15 Aug 2007
Application received
10 Oct 2007
Statutory target date
10 Oct 2007
Delegated decision: Refused · Graham Callam

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.