Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHackneySpringfield Ward wardN16 6ST70 Ravensdale Road, Hackney, London, N16 6ST2009/2614
Planning application · Hackney

2009/2614.

70 Ravensdale Road, Hackney, London, N16 6ST

Lawful Development Certificate at 70 Ravensdale Road, Hackney, London, N16 6ST, received 20 Nov 2009 — refused on 4 Feb 2010 (delegated, Graham Callam).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Refused
Outcome
4 Feb 2010
11 wks
Decision time
3 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
1
Documents
1 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Retention of existing ground floor rear extension

Reference
2009/2614
Type
Certificate of Lawful Development Existing/Proposed
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
20 Nov 2009
Validated
10 Dec 2009
Target date
4 Feb 2010
Decision date
4 Feb 2010
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Reference
2009/2614
Type
Certificate of Lawful Development Existing/Proposed
Show all 17 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
20 Nov 2009
Validated
10 Dec 2009
Target date
4 Feb 2010
Decision date
4 Feb 2010
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
2009/2614 Planning -
2009/2614 Planning -

Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 4 Feb 2010, delegated decision by Graham Callam — 11 weeks from submission (3 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
20 Nov 2009
Application received
10 Dec 2009
Application validated
4 Feb 2010
Statutory target date
4 Feb 2010
Delegated decision: Refused · Graham Callam
20 Nov 2009
Application received
10 Dec 2009
Application validated
4 Feb 2010
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
4 Feb 2010
Delegated decision: Refused · Graham Callam

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.