Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Hackney›…Queensbridge (O) wardE8 3ER76 Lansdowne Drive, Hackney, London, E8 3ER›2009/2888
Planning application · Hackney

2009/2888.

76 Lansdowne Drive, Hackney, London, E8 3ER

Trees at 76 Lansdowne Drive, Hackney, London, E8 3ER, received 15 Dec 2009 — no objection on 28 Jan 2010 (delegated, Nick Jacobs).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
No objection
Outcome
28 Jan 2010
6 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
2
Documents
2 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Prune and reduce crown by 30% at Cherry Tree Located in rear yard

Reference
2009/2888
Type
Works to a Tree in Conservation Area Notification
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
15 Dec 2009
Target date
26 Jan 2010
Decision date
28 Jan 2010
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Premises record
Council register
Reference
2009/2888
Type
Works to a Tree in Conservation Area Notification
Site
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
15 Dec 2009
Target date
26 Jan 2010
Decision date
28 Jan 2010
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
2009/2888 Planning - APPLICATION FORM
—
2009/2888 Planning -
—
2009/2888 Planning - APPLICATION FORM
—
2009/2888 Planning -
—

Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

No objection on 28 Jan 2010, delegated decision by Nick Jacobs — 6 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
15 Dec 2009
Application received
26 Jan 2010
Statutory target date
28 Jan 2010
Delegated decision: No objection · Nick Jacobs
15 Dec 2009
Application received
26 Jan 2010
Statutory target date
28 Jan 2010
Delegated decision: No objection · Nick Jacobs

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.