Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHackneyQueensbridge (O) wardE8 4QD1, REGENTS COURT Pownall Road, Hackney, London, E8 4QD2010/0241
Planning application · Hackney

2010/0241.

1, REGENTS COURT Pownall Road, Hackney, London, E8 4QD

Discharge of Conditions at 1, REGENTS COURT Pownall Road, Hackney, London, E8 4QD, received 3 Feb 2010 — approved on 9 Feb 2010 (delegated, Anthony Traub).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Approved
Outcome
9 Feb 2010
1 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
1
Documents
1 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Submission of details for the discharge of conditions 1 (materials), 2 (landscaping), 3 (tree survey) 4 (tree protection) for planning permission 2009/2328

Reference
2010/0241
Type
Discharge of Condition
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
3 Feb 2010
Validated
4 Feb 2010
Target date
1 Apr 2010
Decision date
9 Feb 2010
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Reference
2010/0241
Type
Discharge of Condition
Show all 17 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
3 Feb 2010
Validated
4 Feb 2010
Target date
1 Apr 2010
Decision date
9 Feb 2010
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
2010/0241 Planning -
2010/0241 Planning -

Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 9 Feb 2010, delegated decision by Anthony Traub — 1 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
3 Feb 2010
Application received
4 Feb 2010
Application validated
1 Apr 2010
Statutory target date
9 Feb 2010
Delegated decision: Approved · Anthony Traub
3 Feb 2010
Application received
4 Feb 2010
Application validated
1 Apr 2010
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
9 Feb 2010
Delegated decision: Approved · Anthony Traub

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.