Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Hackney›…Cazenove Ward wardE5 9BXRAYMOR COURT, 91 Upper Clapton Road, Hackney, London, E5 9BX›2015/0777
Planning application · Hackney

2015/0777.

RAYMOR COURT, 91 Upper Clapton Road, Hackney, London, E5 9BX

Advertisement at RAYMOR COURT, 91 Upper Clapton Road, Hackney, London, E5 9BX, received 5 Mar 2015 — withdrawn on 12 Mar 2015.

Hackney›Cazenove Ward›E5 9BX›2015/0777
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Withdrawn
Outcome
12 Mar 2015
1 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

The council record carries no proposal text.

Reference
2015/0777
Type
Advertisement Consent
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
5 Mar 2015
Target date
30 Apr 2015
Decision date
12 Mar 2015
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Final Decision
Premises record
Council register
Reference
2015/0777
Type
Advertisement Consent
Site
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
5 Mar 2015
Target date
30 Apr 2015
Decision date
12 Mar 2015
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Final Decision
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Withdrawn on 12 Mar 2015 — 1 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
5 Mar 2015
Application received
30 Apr 2015
Statutory target date
12 Mar 2015
Delegated decision: Withdrawn
5 Mar 2015
Application received
30 Apr 2015
Statutory target date
12 Mar 2015
Delegated decision: Withdrawn

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.