Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Hackney›…Stoke Newington Ward wardN16 0QT›2020/0369
Planning application · Hackney

2020/0369.

14 Lordship Road, Hackney, London, N16 0QT

Full / Other Planning at 14 Lordship Road, Hackney, London, N16 0QT, received 31 Jan 2020 — refused on 8 Apr 2020 (delegated, Fabian Culican).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Refused
Outcome
8 Apr 2020
10 wks
Decision time
2 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
27
Documents
27 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of a mansard roof extension for the purposes of a self contined studio flat, and alterations to facade and glazing

Reference
2020/0369
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
31 Jan 2020
Validated
12 Feb 2020
Target date
8 Apr 2020
Decision date
8 Apr 2020
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Council register
Reference
2020/0369
Type
Full Planning Permission
Site
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
31 Jan 2020
Validated
12 Feb 2020
Target date
8 Apr 2020
Decision date
8 Apr 2020
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
2020/0369 Planning - 1244.06 - 032_E_Section C-C.pdf
—
2020/0369 Planning - 1244.06 - 303_P_Section D-D.pdf
—
2020/0369 Planning - 1244.06 - 001_Location Plan.pdf
—
2020/0369 Planning - 1244.06 -022_E_ West elevation.pdf
—
2020/0369 Planning - 1244.06 -200_P_South and North Elevatio
—
2020/0369 Planning - 1244.06 -302_P_Section CC & DD.PDF
—
2020/0369 Planning - 1244.06 - 002_P_Site Plan.pdf
—
2020/0369 Planning - 1244.06 -032_E_Section CC & DD.PDF
—
2020/0369 Planning - 1244.06 -202_P_West Elevation.pdf
—
2020/0369 Planning - DELEGATED_REPORT
—
2020/0369 Planning - 1244.06 - 032_E_Section C-C.pdf
—
2020/0369 Planning - 1244.06 - 303_P_Section D-D.pdf
—
2020/0369 Planning - 1244.06 - 001_Location Plan.pdf
—
Show all 10 rows
2020/0369 Planning - 1244.06 -022_E_ West elevation.pdf
—
2020/0369 Planning - 1244.06 -200_P_South and North Elevatio
—
2020/0369 Planning - 1244.06 -302_P_Section CC & DD.PDF
—
2020/0369 Planning - 1244.06 - 002_P_Site Plan.pdf
—
2020/0369 Planning - 1244.06 -032_E_Section CC & DD.PDF
—
2020/0369 Planning - 1244.06 -202_P_West Elevation.pdf
—
2020/0369 Planning - DELEGATED_REPORT
—

Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 8 Apr 2020, delegated decision by Fabian Culican — 10 weeks from submission (2 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
31 Jan 2020
Application received
12 Feb 2020
Application validated
8 Apr 2020
Statutory target date
8 Apr 2020
Delegated decision: Refused · Fabian Culican
31 Jan 2020
Application received
12 Feb 2020
Application validated
8 Apr 2020
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
8 Apr 2020
Delegated decision: Refused · Fabian Culican

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposal to erect a roof extension at third floor level to provide a self- contained flat including alterations to fenestration on front elevation, is unacceptable on design terms by virtue of its bulk, prominence which adversely impacts the visual amenity of the streetscene and detrimental impact to the setting of nearby listed buildings and the conservation area, the proposal falls contrary to policies DM1 (High Quality Design), DM2 (Development and Amenity), DM19 (General Approach to new Housing Development) DM28 (Managing the Historic Environment), 19 (Housing Growth) of the Local Plan 2015, and policies 24 (Design), 25 (Historic Environment) of the Core Strategy 2010, and policies 7.4 (Local Character), 7.6 (Architecture), 7.8 (Heritage Assets and Archaeology)of the London Plan 2016 (as amended) and Hackney Council SPD Residential Extensions and Alterations (2009) and guidance contained under the NPPF 2019 (as amended).
1
The proposal to erect a roof extension at third floor level to provide a self- contained flat including alterations to fenestration on front elevation, is unacceptable on design terms by virtue of its bulk, prominence which adversely impacts the visual amenity of the streetscene and detrimental impact to the setting of nearby listed buildings and the conservation area, the proposal falls contrary to policies DM1 (High Quality Design), DM2 (Development and Amenity), DM19 (General Approach to new Housing Development) DM28 (Managing the Historic Environment), 19 (Housing Growth) of the Local Plan 2015, and policies 24 (Design), 25 (Historic Environment) of the Core Strategy 2010, and policies 7.4 (Local Character), 7.6 (Architecture), 7.8 (Heritage Assets and Archaeology)of the London Plan 2016 (as amended) and Hackney Council SPD Residential Extensions and Alterations (2009) and guidance contained under the NPPF 2019 (as amended).
Policies cited
NPPF

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.