Planning application · Hackney
2020/0686.
6 Grangecourt Road, Hackney, London, N16 5EG
Householder at 6 Grangecourt Road, Hackney, London, N16 5EG, received 25 Feb 2020 — refused on 20 May 2020 (delegated, Fabian Culican).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Refused
Outcome
20 May 2020
12 wks
Decision time
4 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
5
Documents
5 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Erection of a ground floor rear extension
Reference
2020/0686
Type
Householder Planning
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
25 Feb 2020
Validated
25 Mar 2020
Target date
20 May 2020
Decision date
20 May 2020
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Premises record
Council register
Reference
2020/0686
Type
Householder Planning
Show all 17 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
25 Feb 2020
Validated
25 Mar 2020
Target date
20 May 2020
Decision date
20 May 2020
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Premises record
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 20 May 2020, delegated decision by Fabian Culican — 12 weeks from submission (4 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
25 Feb 2020
Application received
25 Mar 2020
Application validated
20 May 2020
Statutory target date
20 May 2020
Delegated decision: Refused · Fabian Culican
25 Feb 2020
Application received
25 Mar 2020
Application validated
20 May 2020
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
20 May 2020
Delegated decision: Refused · Fabian Culican
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed ground floor rear extension, by reason of its excessive bulk,
scale, massing, detailed design and materials, would result in an obtrusive and
incompatible form of development which would fail to respect the character and
appearance of the subject property and terrace of which it forms part. As such
the proposed development is contrary to policies 7.4 (Local character), and 7.6
(Architecture) of the London Plan (2016), policies 24 (Design) of the Hackney
Local Development Framework Core Strategy (2010), policies DM1 (High
Quality Design) of the Hackney Development Management Local Plan (2015)
and the guidance contained within Hackney Residential Extensions and
Alterations SPD 2009.
1
The proposed ground floor rear extension, by reason of its excessive bulk,
scale, massing, detailed design and materials, would result in an obtrusive and
incompatible form of development which would fail to respect the character and
appearance of the subject property and terrace of which it forms part. As such
the proposed development is contrary to policies 7.4 (Local character), and 7.6
(Architecture) of the London Plan (2016), policies 24 (Design) of the Hackney
Local Development Framework Core Strategy (2010), policies DM1 (High
Quality Design) of the Hackney Development Management Local Plan (2015)
and the guidance contained within Hackney Residential Extensions and
Alterations SPD 2009.
Public response
Comment counts were not captured for this application.
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.