Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHackneyClissold Ward ward2020/1117
Planning application · Hackney

2020/1117.

Flat B, 61 Clissold Crescent, Hackney, London, N16 9AR

Full / Other Planning at Flat B, 61 Clissold Crescent, Hackney, London, N16 9AR, received 6 Apr 2020 — refused on 1 Jun 2020 (delegated, Fabian Culican).

HackneyClissold WardN16 9AR2020/1117
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Refused
Outcome
1 Jun 2020
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
10
Documents
10 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Replacement of existing single-glazed windows and door with double-glazed windows and door, with PVCu frames.

Reference
2020/1117
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N16 9AR
Council
Received
6 Apr 2020
Target date
1 Jun 2020
Decision date
1 Jun 2020
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Reference
2020/1117
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N16 9AR
Council
Received
6 Apr 2020
Target date
1 Jun 2020
Decision date
1 Jun 2020
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
2020/1117 Planning - 61 A B and C Clissold Crescent CIL ques
2020/1117 Planning - DN_FULL_PLANNING_REFUSAL_FINAL
2020/1117 Planning - 61 A B C Clissold Crescent WINDOW REPLA
2020/1117 Planning - 61 A B C Clissold Crescent Block Plan.p
2020/1117 Planning - Peabody DesignAndAccess.pdf
2020/1117 Planning - Site Location Plan.pdf
2020/1117 Planning - 61 A B C Clissold Crescent as existing.
2020/1117 Planning - DELEGATED_REPORT
2020/1117 Planning - Windows A B U.pdf
2020/1117 Planning - ApplicationFormRedacted.pdf
2020/1117 Planning - 61 A B and C Clissold Crescent CIL ques
2020/1117 Planning - DN_FULL_PLANNING_REFUSAL_FINAL
2020/1117 Planning - 61 A B C Clissold Crescent WINDOW REPLA
Show all 10 rows
2020/1117 Planning - 61 A B C Clissold Crescent Block Plan.p
2020/1117 Planning - Peabody DesignAndAccess.pdf
2020/1117 Planning - Site Location Plan.pdf
2020/1117 Planning - 61 A B C Clissold Crescent as existing.
2020/1117 Planning - DELEGATED_REPORT
2020/1117 Planning - Windows A B U.pdf
2020/1117 Planning - ApplicationFormRedacted.pdf

Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 1 Jun 2020, delegated decision by Fabian Culican — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
6 Apr 2020
Application received
1 Jun 2020
Statutory target date
1 Jun 2020
Delegated decision: Refused · Fabian Culican
6 Apr 2020
Application received
1 Jun 2020
Statutory target date
1 Jun 2020
Delegated decision: Refused · Fabian Culican

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development is accompanied by insufficient information and inaccurate plans, which would fail to allow a full and proper assessment of the proposed works, consequently this could result in a detrimental impact on the character and appearance of the property, the streetscene and/or neighbpour amenities by virtue of privacy intrusion/overlooking. As such, the proposal is contrary to Core Strategy (2010) Policy 24 (Design), Development Management Local Plan (2015) Policy DM1 (High Quality Design) and DM2 (Development and Amenity), and policies 7.4 Local Character and 7.6 Architecture of the London Plan (2016) and guidance contained under Hackney councils SPD on Residential Extensions and Alterations (2009) and NPPF 2019 (as amended).
1
The proposed development is accompanied by insufficient information and inaccurate plans, which would fail to allow a full and proper assessment of the proposed works, consequently this could result in a detrimental impact on the character and appearance of the property, the streetscene and/or neighbpour amenities by virtue of privacy intrusion/overlooking. As such, the proposal is contrary to Core Strategy (2010) Policy 24 (Design), Development Management Local Plan (2015) Policy DM1 (High Quality Design) and DM2 (Development and Amenity), and policies 7.4 Local Character and 7.6 Architecture of the London Plan (2016) and guidance contained under Hackney councils SPD on Residential Extensions and Alterations (2009) and NPPF 2019 (as amended).
Policies cited
DM1NPPF

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.