Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHackneyStoke Newington Ward wardN16 0UDHollywood Candy, 117 Stoke Newington Church Street, Hackney, London, N16 0UD2020/3291
Planning application · Hackney

2020/3291.

Hollywood Candy, 117 Stoke Newington Church Street, Hackney, London, N16 0UD

Listed Building at Hollywood Candy, 117 Stoke Newington Church Street, Hackney, London, N16 0UD, received 2 Dec 2020 — refused on 4 Feb 2021 (delegated, Gerard Livett).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Refused
Outcome
4 Feb 2021
9 wks
Decision time
1 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of a two-storey rear extension at first and second floor levels. [Retrospective]

Reference
2020/3291
Type
Listed Building Consent
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
2 Dec 2020
Validated
10 Dec 2020
Target date
4 Feb 2021
Decision date
4 Feb 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Reference
2020/3291
Type
Listed Building Consent
Show all 17 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
2 Dec 2020
Validated
10 Dec 2020
Target date
4 Feb 2021
Decision date
4 Feb 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 4 Feb 2021, delegated decision by Gerard Livett — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
2 Dec 2020
Application received
10 Dec 2020
Application validated
4 Feb 2021
Statutory target date
4 Feb 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Gerard Livett
2 Dec 2020
Application received
10 Dec 2020
Application validated
4 Feb 2021
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
4 Feb 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Gerard Livett

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.