Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHackneySpringfield Ward wardN16 6BU48 Craven Walk, Hackney, London, N16 6BU2020/3573
Planning application · Hackney

2020/3573.

48 Craven Walk, Hackney, London, N16 6BU

Householder at 48 Craven Walk, Hackney, London, N16 6BU, received 17 Nov 2020 — refused on 27 Jan 2021 (delegated, Kim Aukett).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Refused
Outcome
27 Jan 2021
10 wks
Decision time
2 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
11
Documents
11 linked
0
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

First floor rear infill extension

Reference
2020/3573
Type
Householder Planning
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
17 Nov 2020
Validated
2 Dec 2020
Target date
27 Jan 2021
Decision date
27 Jan 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Reference
2020/3573
Type
Householder Planning
Show all 17 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
17 Nov 2020
Validated
2 Dec 2020
Target date
27 Jan 2021
Decision date
27 Jan 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
uploads/79931841613130039:: ::01 APPEAL FORM 633812
12 Feb 2021
Decision Notice
27 Jan 2021
Officer Report
27 Jan 2021
Proposed Elevations PR02
2 Dec 2020
Proposed Floor Plans PR01
2 Dec 2020
Existing elevation EX02
2 Dec 2020
Existing Floor Plans EX01
2 Dec 2020
Application Form - Without Personal Data
20 Nov 2020
Planning Statement
20 Nov 2020
CIL questions
20 Nov 2020
uploads/79931841613130039:: ::01 APPEAL FORM 633812
12 Feb 2021
Decision Notice
27 Jan 2021
Officer Report
27 Jan 2021
Show all 10 rows
Proposed Elevations PR02
2 Dec 2020
Proposed Floor Plans PR01
2 Dec 2020
Existing elevation EX02
2 Dec 2020
Existing Floor Plans EX01
2 Dec 2020
Application Form - Without Personal Data
20 Nov 2020
Planning Statement
20 Nov 2020
CIL questions
20 Nov 2020

Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 27 Jan 2021, delegated decision by Kim Aukett — 10 weeks from submission (2 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
17 Nov 2020
Application received
2 Dec 2020
Application validated
27 Jan 2021
Statutory target date
27 Jan 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Kim Aukett
17 Nov 2020
Application received
2 Dec 2020
Application validated
27 Jan 2021
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
27 Jan 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Kim Aukett

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development, by reason of its design and location, would result in an incompatible form of development which would fail to respect the character and appearance of the subject property and the terrace of which it forms part. As such the proposed development is contrary to policies 7.4 (Local character) and 7.6 (Architecture) of the London Plan 2015, policy LP1 (Design Quality and Local Character) of the Hackney Local Plan 2033 (2020) and the guidance contained within Hackney Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD 2009. Date of Decision: 27-01-2021
1
The proposed development, by reason of its design and location, would result in an incompatible form of development which would fail to respect the character and appearance of the subject property and the terrace of which it forms part. As such the proposed development is contrary to policies 7.4 (Local character) and 7.6 (Architecture) of the London Plan 2015, policy LP1 (Design Quality and Local Character) of the Hackney Local Plan 2033 (2020) and the guidance contained within Hackney Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD 2009. Date of Decision: 27-01-2021

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
Objections
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.