Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHackneyClissold Ward ward2020/3900
Planning application · Hackney

2020/3900.

16 Lidfield Road, Hackney, London, N16 9NA

Householder at 16 Lidfield Road, Hackney, London, N16 9NA, received 7 Dec 2020 — refused on 4 Feb 2021 (delegated, Muhammad Saleem).

HackneyClissold WardN16 9NA2020/3900
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Refused
Outcome
4 Feb 2021
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
6
Documents
6 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

New mansard roof extension.

Reference
2020/3900
Type
Householder Planning
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N16 9NA
Council
Received
7 Dec 2020
Validated
10 Dec 2020
Target date
8 Feb 2021
Decision date
4 Feb 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Reference
2020/3900
Type
Householder Planning
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N16 9NA
Council
Received
7 Dec 2020
Validated
10 Dec 2020
Target date
8 Feb 2021
Decision date
4 Feb 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DN-Householder Granted Final
4 Feb 2021
Officer Report
27 Jan 2021
Drawings
14 Jan 2021
Application Form - Without Personal Data
10 Dec 2020
Design & access statement
10 Dec 2020
CIL questions
10 Dec 2020
DN-Householder Granted Final
4 Feb 2021
Officer Report
27 Jan 2021
Drawings
14 Jan 2021
Show all 6 rows
Application Form - Without Personal Data
10 Dec 2020
Design & access statement
10 Dec 2020
CIL questions
10 Dec 2020

Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 4 Feb 2021, delegated decision by Muhammad Saleem — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
7 Dec 2020
Application received
10 Dec 2020
Application validated
8 Feb 2021
Statutory target date
4 Feb 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Muhammad Saleem
7 Dec 2020
Application received
10 Dec 2020
Application validated
8 Feb 2021
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
4 Feb 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Muhammad Saleem

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed mansard roof addition, by reason of its overall scale, sub- standard design and loss of rear butterfly roof feature, would result in a obtrusive and discordant form of development which fails to respect the character and appearance of the host building and surrounding area. As such, it would be contrary to policies 7.4 (Local Character) and 7.6 (Architecture) of the London Plan (2016), policies D1 (London’s form, character and capacity for growth) and D4 (Delivering good design) of the emerging Draft New London Plan (Intend to Publish) (2019), policy LP1 of the Hackney Local Plan (2020) and the guidance contained with the Hackney Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document. Date of Decision: 04-02-2021
1
The proposed mansard roof addition, by reason of its overall scale, sub- standard design and loss of rear butterfly roof feature, would result in a obtrusive and discordant form of development which fails to respect the character and appearance of the host building and surrounding area. As such, it would be contrary to policies 7.4 (Local Character) and 7.6 (Architecture) of the London Plan (2016), policies D1 (London’s form, character and capacity for growth) and D4 (Delivering good design) of the emerging Draft New London Plan (Intend to Publish) (2019), policy LP1 of the Hackney Local Plan (2020) and the guidance contained with the Hackney Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document. Date of Decision: 04-02-2021
Policies cited
LP1

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.