Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHackneySpringfield Ward wardN16 6TH127 Ravensdale Road, Hackney, London, N16 6TH2020/4000
Planning application · Hackney

2020/4000.

127 Ravensdale Road, Hackney, London, N16 6TH

Full / Other Planning at 127 Ravensdale Road, Hackney, London, N16 6TH, received 14 Dec 2020 — refused on 17 Feb 2021 (delegated, James Clark).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Refused
Outcome
17 Feb 2021
9 wks
Decision time
1 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
5
Documents
5 linked
0
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of rear dormer roof extension and second floor roof extension over the existing outrigger. Installation of three rooflights

Reference
2020/4000
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
14 Dec 2020
Target date
18 Feb 2021
Decision date
17 Feb 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Reference
2020/4000
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
14 Dec 2020
Target date
18 Feb 2021
Decision date
17 Feb 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DN-Full Planning Granted Final
17 Feb 2021
Officer Report
27 Jan 2021
Drawings
20 Jan 2021
Application Form - Without Personal Data
16 Dec 2020
CIL questions
16 Dec 2020
DN-Full Planning Granted Final
17 Feb 2021
Officer Report
27 Jan 2021
Drawings
20 Jan 2021
Show all 5 rows
Application Form - Without Personal Data
16 Dec 2020
CIL questions
16 Dec 2020

Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 17 Feb 2021, delegated decision by James Clark — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
14 Dec 2020
Application received
18 Feb 2021
Statutory target date
17 Feb 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · James Clark
14 Dec 2020
Application received
18 Feb 2021
Statutory target date
17 Feb 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · James Clark

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed rear dormer and outrigger roof extensions, by reason of excessive depth, bulk, design and siting would result in an obtrusive and incompatible form of development which would fail to respect the character and appearance of the subject property and surrounding area. As such, it would be contrary to policies 7.4 (Local Character) and 7.6 (Architecture) of the London Plan (2016), policies D1 (London’s form, character and capacity for growth) and D4 (Delivering good design) of the emerging Draft New London Plan (Intend to Publish) (2019), policy LP1 of the Hackney Local Plan (2020) and the guidance contained with the Hackney Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document. Date of Decision: 17-02-2021
1
The proposed rear dormer and outrigger roof extensions, by reason of excessive depth, bulk, design and siting would result in an obtrusive and incompatible form of development which would fail to respect the character and appearance of the subject property and surrounding area. As such, it would be contrary to policies 7.4 (Local Character) and 7.6 (Architecture) of the London Plan (2016), policies D1 (London’s form, character and capacity for growth) and D4 (Delivering good design) of the emerging Draft New London Plan (Intend to Publish) (2019), policy LP1 of the Hackney Local Plan (2020) and the guidance contained with the Hackney Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document. Date of Decision: 17-02-2021
Policies cited
LP1

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
Objections
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.