Planning application · Hackney
2021/0244.
63 Castlewood Road, Hackney, London, N16 6DJ
Full / Other Planning at 63 Castlewood Road, Hackney, London, N16 6DJ, received 27 Jan 2021 — refused on 24 Mar 2021 (delegated, Kelsi Bolstad).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Refused
Outcome
24 Mar 2021
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
7
Documents
7 linked
3
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Erection of a rear dormer to the main roof and the outrigger and two front rooflights.
Reference
2021/0244
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
27 Jan 2021
Target date
24 Mar 2021
Decision date
24 Mar 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Premises record
Council register
Reference
2021/0244
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
27 Jan 2021
Target date
24 Mar 2021
Decision date
24 Mar 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Premises record
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 24 Mar 2021, delegated decision by Kelsi Bolstad — 8 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
27 Jan 2021
Application received
24 Mar 2021
Statutory target date
24 Mar 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Kelsi Bolstad
27 Jan 2021
Application received
24 Mar 2021
Statutory target date
24 Mar 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Kelsi Bolstad
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development, by reason of its excessive bulk, scale, and
detailed design would result in an obtrusive and incompatible form of
development which would fail to respect the character and appearance of the
subject property and terrace of which it forms part. As such the proposed
development is contrary to policies D3 (Optimising site capacity through the
design-led approach) and D6 (Housing quality and standards) of the London
Plan 2021, policy LP1 ( Design Quality and Local Character) of the Local Plan
2033 and the guidance contained within Hackney Residential Extensions and
Alterations SPD 2009.
2
The proposed development, by reason of its design and position, would
result in overlooking and a lack of privacy which would result in an
unacceptable adverse impact on the amenity of the neighbouring occupiers.
As such the proposed development is contrary to policy D3 (Optimising site
capacity through the design-led approach) of the London Plan 2021, policy
LP2 (Development and Amenity) of the Local Plan 2033 and the guidance
contained within Hackney Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD 2009.
Date of Decision: 24-03-2021
1
The proposed development, by reason of its excessive bulk, scale, and
detailed design would result in an obtrusive and incompatible form of
development which would fail to respect the character and appearance of the
subject property and terrace of which it forms part. As such the proposed
development is contrary to policies D3 (Optimising site capacity through the
design-led approach) and D6 (Housing quality and standards) of the London
Plan 2021, policy LP1 ( Design Quality and Local Character) of the Local Plan
2033 and the guidance contained within Hackney Residential Extensions and
Alterations SPD 2009.
2
The proposed development, by reason of its design and position, would
result in overlooking and a lack of privacy which would result in an
unacceptable adverse impact on the amenity of the neighbouring occupiers.
As such the proposed development is contrary to policy D3 (Optimising site
capacity through the design-led approach) of the London Plan 2021, policy
LP2 (Development and Amenity) of the Local Plan 2033 and the guidance
contained within Hackney Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD 2009.
Date of Decision: 24-03-2021
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
3
Objections
3
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.