Planning application · Hackney
2021/0330.
40 Lavender Grove, Hackney, London, E8 3LS
Householder at 40 Lavender Grove, Hackney, London, E8 3LS, received 4 Feb 2021 — refused on 31 Mar 2021 (delegated, Kim Aukett).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Refused
Outcome
31 Mar 2021
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
14
Documents
14 linked
1
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Proposal to extend the outrigger with an additional level.
Reference
2021/0330
Type
Householder Planning
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
E8 3LS
Council
Received
4 Feb 2021
Target date
1 Apr 2021
Decision date
31 Mar 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Council register
Reference
2021/0330
Type
Householder Planning
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
E8 3LS
Council
Received
4 Feb 2021
Target date
1 Apr 2021
Decision date
31 Mar 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 31 Mar 2021, delegated decision by Kim Aukett — 8 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
4 Feb 2021
Application received
1 Apr 2021
Statutory target date
31 Mar 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Kim Aukett
4 Feb 2021
Application received
1 Apr 2021
Statutory target date
31 Mar 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Kim Aukett
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development, by reason of its siting, scale, massing and
detailed design would result in an obtrusive and incompatible form of
development which would fail to respect the character and appearance of the
subject property, the terrace of which it forms part and would fail to preserve
or enhance the character and appearance of the Graham Road & Mapledene
Conservation Area, contrary to policy D3 ‘Optimising site capacity through the
design-led approach’ of the London Plan (2021), policy LP1 ‘Design Quality
and Local Character’ of the Hackney Local Plan 2033 (2020) and guidance
contained within Hackney Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD 2009
and the National Planning Policy Framework (2019).
1
The proposed development, by reason of its siting, scale, massing and
detailed design would result in an obtrusive and incompatible form of
development which would fail to respect the character and appearance of the
subject property, the terrace of which it forms part and would fail to preserve
or enhance the character and appearance of the Graham Road & Mapledene
Conservation Area, contrary to policy D3 ‘Optimising site capacity through the
design-led approach’ of the London Plan (2021), policy LP1 ‘Design Quality
and Local Character’ of the Hackney Local Plan 2033 (2020) and guidance
contained within Hackney Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD 2009
and the National Planning Policy Framework (2019).
Policies cited
NPPF
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
1
Objections
1
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.