Planning application · Hackney
2021/0639.
508A Kingsland Road, Hackney, London, E8 4AE
Full / Other Planning at 508A Kingsland Road, Hackney, London, E8 4AE, received 1 Mar 2021 — refused on 26 Apr 2021 (delegated, Erin Glancy).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Refused
Outcome
26 Apr 2021
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
11
Documents
11 linked
0
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Erection of a part-one part-two storey residential roof extension atop 508a Kingsland Road to provide 3 residential units
Reference
2021/0639
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
1 Mar 2021
Target date
26 Apr 2021
Decision date
26 Apr 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Premises record
Council register
Reference
2021/0639
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
1 Mar 2021
Target date
26 Apr 2021
Decision date
26 Apr 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Premises record
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 26 Apr 2021, delegated decision by Erin Glancy — 8 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
1 Mar 2021
Application received
26 Apr 2021
Statutory target date
26 Apr 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Erin Glancy
1 Mar 2021
Application received
26 Apr 2021
Statutory target date
26 Apr 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Erin Glancy
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposal, by reason of its failure to provide a contribution for affordable
housing, represents an unsustainable form of development. As such the
proposal is contrary to policies LP1 (Design Quality and Local Character) and
LP13 (Affordable Housing) of the Hackney Local Plan (2020) and the
Supplementary Planning Document: S106 Planning Contributions (2020).
2
The proposed two storey roof extension, by reason of scale and design
appears as an incongruous and overbearing addition to the host building that
fails to respond to the existing hierarchies between the front and back along
this terrace, and the historic development of the site. As such, the proposed
development is contrary to policies D3 (Optimising site capacity through the
design-led approach) and HC1 (Heritage conservation and growth) of the
London Plan (2021); policies LP1 (Design quality and local character), LP2
(Development and amenity) and LP3 (Designated heritage assets) of
Hackney’s Local Plan 2033 (2020) and the Hackney Residential Extensions
and Alterations SPD (2009).
1
The proposal, by reason of its failure to provide a contribution for affordable
housing, represents an unsustainable form of development. As such the
proposal is contrary to policies LP1 (Design Quality and Local Character) and
LP13 (Affordable Housing) of the Hackney Local Plan (2020) and the
Supplementary Planning Document: S106 Planning Contributions (2020).
2
The proposed two storey roof extension, by reason of scale and design
appears as an incongruous and overbearing addition to the host building that
fails to respond to the existing hierarchies between the front and back along
this terrace, and the historic development of the site. As such, the proposed
development is contrary to policies D3 (Optimising site capacity through the
design-led approach) and HC1 (Heritage conservation and growth) of the
London Plan (2021); policies LP1 (Design quality and local character), LP2
(Development and amenity) and LP3 (Designated heritage assets) of
Hackney’s Local Plan 2033 (2020) and the Hackney Residential Extensions
and Alterations SPD (2009).
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
Objections
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.