Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHackneyCazenove Ward ward2021/3699
Planning application · Hackney

2021/3699.

Flat C, 12 Alkham Road, Hackney, London, N16 7AA

Full / Other Planning at Flat C, 12 Alkham Road, Hackney, London, N16 7AA, received 21 Dec 2021 — refused on 16 Mar 2022 (delegated, Micheal Garvey).

HackneyCazenove WardN16 7AA2021/3699
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Refused
Outcome
16 Mar 2022
12 wks
Decision time
4 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
14
Documents
14 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Formation of rear balcony to existing rear dormer and replacement of dormer windows with new door

Reference
2021/3699
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N16 7AA
Council
Received
21 Dec 2021
Validated
19 Jan 2022
Target date
16 Mar 2022
Decision date
16 Mar 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Reference
2021/3699
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N16 7AA
Council
Received
21 Dec 2021
Validated
19 Jan 2022
Target date
16 Mar 2022
Decision date
16 Mar 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Appeal Decision
7 Dec 2022
Statement of appeal
31 May 2022
Appeal Form
31 May 2022
DN-Full Planning Refusal Final
16 Mar 2022
Officer Report
16 Mar 2022
Application Form
19 Jan 2022
211220-Design-and-Access-Statement
19 Jan 2022
CIL questions
19 Jan 2022
2104-03-100-extg-and-prop-sections
19 Jan 2022
2104-02-100-extg-and-prop-rear-ele
19 Jan 2022
Appeal Decision
7 Dec 2022
Statement of appeal
31 May 2022
Appeal Form
31 May 2022
Show all 10 rows
DN-Full Planning Refusal Final
16 Mar 2022
Officer Report
16 Mar 2022
Application Form
19 Jan 2022
211220-Design-and-Access-Statement
19 Jan 2022
CIL questions
19 Jan 2022
2104-03-100-extg-and-prop-sections
19 Jan 2022
2104-02-100-extg-and-prop-rear-ele
19 Jan 2022

Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 16 Mar 2022, delegated decision by Micheal Garvey — 12 weeks from submission (4 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
21 Dec 2021
Application received
19 Jan 2022
Application validated
16 Mar 2022
Statutory target date
16 Mar 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Micheal Garvey
21 Dec 2021
Application received
19 Jan 2022
Application validated
16 Mar 2022
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
16 Mar 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Micheal Garvey

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposal by reason of its size, design and position would result in an incongruous and incompatible form of development which would fail to respect the character and appearance of the subject property and the terrace it forms part of. As such, would therefore be contrary to policies LP1 (Design Quality and Local Character) of Hackney's LP33 and policies D3 (Optimising site capacity through the design-led approach) and D4 (Delivering good design) of the London Plan and Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD 2009.
1
The proposal by reason of its size, design and position would result in an incongruous and incompatible form of development which would fail to respect the character and appearance of the subject property and the terrace it forms part of. As such, would therefore be contrary to policies LP1 (Design Quality and Local Character) of Hackney's LP33 and policies D3 (Optimising site capacity through the design-led approach) and D4 (Delivering good design) of the London Plan and Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD 2009.

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.