Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHackneyLondon Fields Ward wardE8 4RGMusti Sharp Barber Salon, 65 Mare Street, Hackney, London, E8 4RG2022/0149
Planning application · Hackney

2022/0149.

Musti Sharp Barber Salon, 65 Mare Street, Hackney, London, E8 4RG

Full / Other Planning at Musti Sharp Barber Salon, 65 Mare Street, Hackney, London, E8 4RG, received 10 Jan 2022 — refused on 29 Jul 2022 (delegated, James Clark).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Refused
Outcome
29 Jul 2022
29 wks
Decision time
21 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
15
Documents
15 linked
0
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Retention of an Automated Teller Machine (ATM) (in association with Advertisement Consent 2022/0046)

Reference
2022/0149
Type
Full Planning Permission
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
10 Jan 2022
Validated
13 Jun 2022
Target date
8 Aug 2022
Decision date
29 Jul 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Reference
2022/0149
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 17 rows
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
10 Jan 2022
Validated
13 Jun 2022
Target date
8 Aug 2022
Decision date
29 Jul 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Appeal Decision
5 Jun 2023
Statement of Appeal
25 Oct 2022
Appeal Form
25 Oct 2022
DN-Full Planning Refusal Final
29 Jul 2022
Officer Report
22 Jul 2022
Site Location Plan
15 Jun 2022
BLOCK-PLAN
15 Jun 2022
ILLUMINATED-LOGO-PANEL
24 Jan 2022
Photo
24 Jan 2022
Photo
24 Jan 2022
Appeal Decision
5 Jun 2023
Statement of Appeal
25 Oct 2022
Appeal Form
25 Oct 2022
Show all 10 rows
DN-Full Planning Refusal Final
29 Jul 2022
Officer Report
22 Jul 2022
Site Location Plan
15 Jun 2022
BLOCK-PLAN
15 Jun 2022
ILLUMINATED-LOGO-PANEL
24 Jan 2022
Photo
24 Jan 2022
Photo
24 Jan 2022

Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 29 Jul 2022, delegated decision by James Clark — 29 weeks from submission (21 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
10 Jan 2022
Application received
13 Jun 2022
Application validated
8 Aug 2022
Statutory target date
29 Jul 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · James Clark
10 Jan 2022
Application received
13 Jun 2022
Application validated
8 Aug 2022
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
29 Jul 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · James Clark

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development, by reason of its scale, siting and appearance, would result in an obtrusive and incompatible form of development which would detrimentally impact the character and appearance the application site, surrounding streetscene and Conservation Area of which the site forms part. As such the proposed development is contrary to policy D4 'Delivering good design' and policy HC1 'Heritage conservation and growth' of the London Plan (2021) as well as Policy LP1 'Design Quality and Local Character' and LP3 'Designated Heritage Assets' of the Hackney Local Plan and the guidance contained within Hackney Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD 2009. Date of Decision: 29-07-2022
1
The proposed development, by reason of its scale, siting and appearance, would result in an obtrusive and incompatible form of development which would detrimentally impact the character and appearance the application site, surrounding streetscene and Conservation Area of which the site forms part. As such the proposed development is contrary to policy D4 'Delivering good design' and policy HC1 'Heritage conservation and growth' of the London Plan (2021) as well as Policy LP1 'Design Quality and Local Character' and LP3 'Designated Heritage Assets' of the Hackney Local Plan and the guidance contained within Hackney Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD 2009. Date of Decision: 29-07-2022

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
Objections
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.