Planning application · Hackney
2022/0973.
Flat 7, 39 Blurton Road, Hackney, London, E5 0NJ
Full / Other Planning at Flat 7, 39 Blurton Road, Hackney, London, E5 0NJ, received 18 Apr 2022 — refused on 13 Jun 2022 (delegated, Raymond Okot).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Refused
Outcome
13 Jun 2022
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
8
Documents
8 linked
3
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Erection of a mansard roof extension
Reference
2022/0973
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
18 Apr 2022
Target date
13 Jun 2022
Decision date
13 Jun 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Premises record
Council register
Reference
2022/0973
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
18 Apr 2022
Target date
13 Jun 2022
Decision date
13 Jun 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Premises record
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 13 Jun 2022, delegated decision by Raymond Okot — 8 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
18 Apr 2022
Application received
13 Jun 2022
Statutory target date
13 Jun 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Raymond Okot
18 Apr 2022
Application received
13 Jun 2022
Statutory target date
13 Jun 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Raymond Okot
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development, by reason of its size, design and location,
would result in an incompatible form of development, which would adversely
affect the character and appearance of the host building and other buildings
in the terrace. As such, the proposal is considered contrary to policy D3
(Optimising site capacity through the design-led approach) of the London
Plan (2021) and Policy LP1 (Design Quality and Local Character) of
Hackney’s Local Plan 2033 (2020) and the relevant sections Hackney’s
Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD (2009).
1
The proposed development, by reason of its size, design and location,
would result in an incompatible form of development, which would adversely
affect the character and appearance of the host building and other buildings
in the terrace. As such, the proposal is considered contrary to policy D3
(Optimising site capacity through the design-led approach) of the London
Plan (2021) and Policy LP1 (Design Quality and Local Character) of
Hackney’s Local Plan 2033 (2020) and the relevant sections Hackney’s
Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD (2009).
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
3
Objections
3
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.