Planning application · Hackney
2022/1146.
77 Heron Drive, Hackney, London, N4 2FS
Householder at 77 Heron Drive, Hackney, London, N4 2FS, received 9 May 2022 — refused on 11 Jul 2022 (delegated, Erin Glancy).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Refused
Outcome
11 Jul 2022
9 wks
Decision time
1 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
22
Documents
22 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Erection of an additional storey to create additional habitable accommodation (bedrooms)
Reference
2022/1146
Type
Householder Planning
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
9 May 2022
Validated
18 May 2022
Target date
13 Jul 2022
Decision date
11 Jul 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Premises record
Council register
Reference
2022/1146
Type
Householder Planning
Show all 17 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
9 May 2022
Validated
18 May 2022
Target date
13 Jul 2022
Decision date
11 Jul 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Premises record
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 11 Jul 2022, delegated decision by Erin Glancy — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
9 May 2022
Application received
18 May 2022
Application validated
13 Jul 2022
Statutory target date
11 Jul 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Erin Glancy
9 May 2022
Application received
18 May 2022
Application validated
13 Jul 2022
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
11 Jul 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Erin Glancy
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development, by way of its scale, massing,
location and design, would result in an incongruous and discordant
form of development to the detriment of the character and
appearance of the application site, adjoining terrace and the wider
Stoke Newington Reservoirs, Filter Beds and New River
Conservation Area and Brownswood Conservation Area. The
proposal is considered contrary to the NPPF, policies D3
(Optimising site capacity through the design-led approach), D4
(Delivering good design) and HC1 ( Heritage conservation and
growth) of the London Plan 2021, and policies LP1 (Design
Quality and Local Character) and LP3 (Designated Heritage
Assets) of Hackney’s Local Plan 2033 (2020) and Hackney’s
Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD (2009).
1
The proposed development, by way of its scale, massing,
location and design, would result in an incongruous and discordant
form of development to the detriment of the character and
appearance of the application site, adjoining terrace and the wider
Stoke Newington Reservoirs, Filter Beds and New River
Conservation Area and Brownswood Conservation Area. The
proposal is considered contrary to the NPPF, policies D3
(Optimising site capacity through the design-led approach), D4
(Delivering good design) and HC1 ( Heritage conservation and
growth) of the London Plan 2021, and policies LP1 (Design
Quality and Local Character) and LP3 (Designated Heritage
Assets) of Hackney’s Local Plan 2033 (2020) and Hackney’s
Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD (2009).
Policies cited
NPPF
Public response
Comment counts were not captured for this application.
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.