Planning application · Hackney
2022/1768.
Flat B, 28 Millfields Road, Hackney, London, E5 0SB
Householder at Flat B, 28 Millfields Road, Hackney, London, E5 0SB, received 16 Jul 2022 — refused on 12 Sep 2022 (delegated, Alishba Emanuel).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Refused
Outcome
12 Sep 2022
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
13
Documents
13 linked
0
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Erection of a roof extension with 1x rooflight and installation of 2x rooflights on the roof of existing loft conversion.
Reference
2022/1768
Type
Householder Planning
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
16 Jul 2022
Validated
19 Jul 2022
Target date
13 Sep 2022
Decision date
12 Sep 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Premises record
Council register
Reference
2022/1768
Type
Householder Planning
Show all 17 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
16 Jul 2022
Validated
19 Jul 2022
Target date
13 Sep 2022
Decision date
12 Sep 2022
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Premises record
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 12 Sep 2022, delegated decision by Alishba Emanuel — 8 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
16 Jul 2022
Application received
19 Jul 2022
Application validated
13 Sep 2022
Statutory target date
12 Sep 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Alishba Emanuel
16 Jul 2022
Application received
19 Jul 2022
Application validated
13 Sep 2022
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
12 Sep 2022
Delegated decision: Refused · Alishba Emanuel
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed rear extension, by reason of its siting, scale and
design would result in an incongruous development that would be
overly prominent and disrupt the character of the terrace. The
proposal, therefore, fails to comply with policies D3 ( Optimising
site capacity through the design-led approach) and D4( Delivering
Good Design) of the London Plan (2021) and Policy LP1 ( Design,
Quality and Local Character) of the Hackney Local Plan (2020)
and the Supplementary Planning Document: Residential
Extensions and Alterations 2009.
2
The proposed windows to the side elevation of the two storey
rear addition by virtue of their design and siting would constitute an
incompatible form of development which would fail to have regard
to the character of the host building or surrounding area. The
proposal, therefore, fails to comply with policies D3 ( Optimising
site capacity through the design-led approach) and D4( Delivering
Good Design) of the London Plan (2021) and Policy LP1 ( Design,
Quality and Local Character) of the Hackney Local Plan (2020)
and the Supplementary Planning Document: Residential
Extensions and Alterations 2009.
1
The proposed rear extension, by reason of its siting, scale and
design would result in an incongruous development that would be
overly prominent and disrupt the character of the terrace. The
proposal, therefore, fails to comply with policies D3 ( Optimising
site capacity through the design-led approach) and D4( Delivering
Good Design) of the London Plan (2021) and Policy LP1 ( Design,
Quality and Local Character) of the Hackney Local Plan (2020)
and the Supplementary Planning Document: Residential
Extensions and Alterations 2009.
2
The proposed windows to the side elevation of the two storey
rear addition by virtue of their design and siting would constitute an
incompatible form of development which would fail to have regard
to the character of the host building or surrounding area. The
proposal, therefore, fails to comply with policies D3 ( Optimising
site capacity through the design-led approach) and D4( Delivering
Good Design) of the London Plan (2021) and Policy LP1 ( Design,
Quality and Local Character) of the Hackney Local Plan (2020)
and the Supplementary Planning Document: Residential
Extensions and Alterations 2009.
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
Objections
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.