Planning application · Hackney
2022/2687.
59 Kenworthy Road, Hackney, London, E9 5RB
Full / Other Planning at 59 Kenworthy Road, Hackney, London, E9 5RB, received 7 Nov 2022 — refused on 22 Oct 2024 (delegated, James Clark).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Refused
Outcome
22 Oct 2024
102 wks
Decision time
94 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
16
Documents
16 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Proposed conversion of an existing single dwellinghouse to form 1 x three bedroom maisonette and 1 x one bedroom flat.
Reference
2022/2687
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
E9 5RB
Council
Received
7 Nov 2022
Validated
24 Nov 2022
Target date
25 Oct 2024
Decision date
22 Oct 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Council register
Reference
2022/2687
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
E9 5RB
Council
Received
7 Nov 2022
Validated
24 Nov 2022
Target date
25 Oct 2024
Decision date
22 Oct 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 22 Oct 2024, delegated decision by James Clark — 102 weeks from submission (94 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
7 Nov 2022
Application received
24 Nov 2022
Application validated
25 Oct 2024
Statutory target date
22 Oct 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · James Clark
7 Nov 2022
Application received
24 Nov 2022
Application validated
25 Oct 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
22 Oct 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · James Clark
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development, has failed to enter into a car free agreement
and would therefore it would not contribute to offsetting congestion, pollution
and parking stress whilst also failing to promote active travel. The proposal is
considered contrary to the NPPF, policies T4 (Assessing and mitigating
transport impacts), T6 (Car parking) and T6.1 (Residential parking) of the
London Plan 2021 and policies LP43 (Transport and Development) and LP45
(Parking and Car Free Development) of Hackney’s Local Plan 2033.
2
The proposed development, has failed to agree to make carbon offset
payments and therefore the development will not achieve zero-carbon
standards and contribute to mitigating climate change. The proposal is
considered contrary to the NPPF, policy SI 2 (Minimising greenhouse gas
emissions) of the London Plan 2021 and policy LP55 (Mitigating Climate
Change) of Hackney’s Local Plan 2033.
Date of Decision: 22-10-2024
1
The proposed development, has failed to enter into a car free agreement
and would therefore it would not contribute to offsetting congestion, pollution
and parking stress whilst also failing to promote active travel. The proposal is
considered contrary to the NPPF, policies T4 (Assessing and mitigating
transport impacts), T6 (Car parking) and T6.1 (Residential parking) of the
London Plan 2021 and policies LP43 (Transport and Development) and LP45
(Parking and Car Free Development) of Hackney’s Local Plan 2033.
2
The proposed development, has failed to agree to make carbon offset
payments and therefore the development will not achieve zero-carbon
standards and contribute to mitigating climate change. The proposal is
considered contrary to the NPPF, policy SI 2 (Minimising greenhouse gas
emissions) of the London Plan 2021 and policy LP55 (Mitigating Climate
Change) of Hackney’s Local Plan 2033.
Date of Decision: 22-10-2024
Policies cited
NPPF
Public response
Comment counts were not captured for this application.
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.