Planning application · Hackney
2023/0889.
60 Rushmore Road, Hackney, London, E5 0EX
Lawful Development Certificate at 60 Rushmore Road, Hackney, London, E5 0EX, received 19 Apr 2023 — refused on 30 Jun 2023 (delegated, Jessica Neeve).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Refused
Outcome
30 Jun 2023
10 wks
Decision time
2 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
18
Documents
18 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Proposed works: Erection of a rear roof extension over the outrigger; the erection of a rear roof extension over the original dwelling house; and the erection of an outbuilding.
Reference
2023/0889
Type
Certificate of Lawful Development Existing/Proposed
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
19 Apr 2023
Validated
5 May 2023
Target date
30 Jun 2023
Decision date
30 Jun 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Premises record
Council register
Reference
2023/0889
Type
Certificate of Lawful Development Existing/Proposed
Show all 17 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
19 Apr 2023
Validated
5 May 2023
Target date
30 Jun 2023
Decision date
30 Jun 2023
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Premises record
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 30 Jun 2023, delegated decision by Jessica Neeve — 10 weeks from submission (2 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
19 Apr 2023
Application received
5 May 2023
Application validated
30 Jun 2023
Statutory target date
30 Jun 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Jessica Neeve
19 Apr 2023
Application received
5 May 2023
Application validated
30 Jun 2023
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
30 Jun 2023
Delegated decision: Refused · Jessica Neeve
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
This Certificate is issued solely for the purpose of Section 191 of
the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended).
2
It certifies that the use/ operations/ matter specified in the First
Schedule taking place on the land described in the Second
Schedule would have been lawful on the specified date and, thus
was not liable to enforcement action under Section 172 of the 1990
Act on that date.
3
This Certificate applies only to the extent of the use/ operations/
matter described in the First Schedule and to the land specified in
the Second Schedule. Any use/ operations/ matter which is
materially different from that described or which relates to other
land may render the owner or occupier liable to enforcement
action.
4
The effect of the certificate is also qualified by the proviso in
Section 192(4) of the 1990 Act (as amended) which states that the
lawfulness of a described use or operation is only conclusively
presumed where there has been no material change, before the
use is instituted or the operations begun, in any of the matters
relevant to determine such lawfulness.
Date of Decision: 30-06-2023
1
This Certificate is issued solely for the purpose of Section 191 of
the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended).
2
It certifies that the use/ operations/ matter specified in the First
Schedule taking place on the land described in the Second
Schedule would have been lawful on the specified date and, thus
was not liable to enforcement action under Section 172 of the 1990
Act on that date.
3
This Certificate applies only to the extent of the use/ operations/
matter described in the First Schedule and to the land specified in
the Second Schedule. Any use/ operations/ matter which is
materially different from that described or which relates to other
land may render the owner or occupier liable to enforcement
action.
Show all 4 rows
4
The effect of the certificate is also qualified by the proviso in
Section 192(4) of the 1990 Act (as amended) which states that the
lawfulness of a described use or operation is only conclusively
presumed where there has been no material change, before the
use is instituted or the operations begun, in any of the matters
relevant to determine such lawfulness.
Date of Decision: 30-06-2023
Public response
Comment counts were not captured for this application.
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.