Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHackneyHoxton West Ward wardN1 7QJSushi Box, 86 Murray Grove, Hackney, London, N1 7QJ2023/2111
Planning application · Hackney

2023/2111.

Sushi Box, 86 Murray Grove, Hackney, London, N1 7QJ

Full / Other Planning at Sushi Box, 86 Murray Grove, Hackney, London, N1 7QJ, received 11 Sep 2023 — refused on 3 May 2024 (delegated, James Clark).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Refused
Outcome
3 May 2024
34 wks
Decision time
26 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
10
Documents
10 linked
0
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Change of use of existing restaurant (class E) use to a restaurant and takeaway (Sui Generis) together with the retrospective installation of an extraction ducting system.

Reference
2023/2111
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
11 Sep 2023
Validated
17 Oct 2023
Target date
12 Dec 2023
Decision date
3 May 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Reference
2023/2111
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 17 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
11 Sep 2023
Validated
17 Oct 2023
Target date
12 Dec 2023
Decision date
3 May 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DN-Full Planning Refusal Final
3 May 2024
Officer Report
7 Mar 2024
Existing and proposed elevations
20 Oct 2023
Extraction-and-Flue-Notes-pt1
2 Oct 2023
Block-Plan
2 Oct 2023
Extraction-and-Flue-Notes-pt2
2 Oct 2023
CIL-Form
2 Oct 2023
Noise-Impact-Assessment
2 Oct 2023
Site-Location-Plan
2 Oct 2023
Application Form - Without Personal Data
13 Sept 2023
DN-Full Planning Refusal Final
3 May 2024
Officer Report
7 Mar 2024
Existing and proposed elevations
20 Oct 2023
Show all 10 rows
Extraction-and-Flue-Notes-pt1
2 Oct 2023
Block-Plan
2 Oct 2023
Extraction-and-Flue-Notes-pt2
2 Oct 2023
CIL-Form
2 Oct 2023
Noise-Impact-Assessment
2 Oct 2023
Site-Location-Plan
2 Oct 2023
Application Form - Without Personal Data
13 Sept 2023

Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 3 May 2024, delegated decision by James Clark — 34 weeks from submission (26 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
11 Sep 2023
Application received
17 Oct 2023
Application validated
12 Dec 2023
Statutory target date
3 May 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · James Clark
11 Sep 2023
Application received
17 Oct 2023
Application validated
12 Dec 2023
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
3 May 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · James Clark

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The flue, by reason of its inappropriate position in close proximity below residential windows and the lack of sufficient odour and pollution mitigation, would give rise to adverse pollution and odour impacts, to the detriment of the living conditions of nearby residential occupiers, contrary to Hackney's LP33 Policies LP2 (Development and Amenity) and LP58 (Improving the Environment - Pollution), London Plan (2021) policy SI 1 (Improving Air Quality). Date of Decision: 03-05-2024
1
The flue, by reason of its inappropriate position in close proximity below residential windows and the lack of sufficient odour and pollution mitigation, would give rise to adverse pollution and odour impacts, to the detriment of the living conditions of nearby residential occupiers, contrary to Hackney's LP33 Policies LP2 (Development and Amenity) and LP58 (Improving the Environment - Pollution), London Plan (2021) policy SI 1 (Improving Air Quality). Date of Decision: 03-05-2024

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
Objections
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.