Planning application · Hackney
2023/2183.
17 Foulden Road, Hackney, London, N16 7UU
Householder at 17 Foulden Road, Hackney, London, N16 7UU, received 19 Sep 2023 — refused on 21 Mar 2024 (delegated, Jessica Neeve).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Refused
Outcome
21 Mar 2024
26 wks
Decision time
18 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
10
Documents
10 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Proposed works: Erection of a mansard roof extension; rear infill extension; roof terrace; and ASHP.
Reference
2023/2183
Type
Householder Planning
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
19 Sep 2023
Validated
25 Jan 2024
Target date
21 Mar 2024
Decision date
21 Mar 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Premises record
Council register
Reference
2023/2183
Type
Householder Planning
Show all 17 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
19 Sep 2023
Validated
25 Jan 2024
Target date
21 Mar 2024
Decision date
21 Mar 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Premises record
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 21 Mar 2024, delegated decision by Jessica Neeve — 26 weeks from submission (18 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
19 Sep 2023
Application received
25 Jan 2024
Application validated
21 Mar 2024
Statutory target date
21 Mar 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Jessica Neeve
19 Sep 2023
Application received
25 Jan 2024
Application validated
21 Mar 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
21 Mar 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Jessica Neeve
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed detailed design and fenestration pattern of the
mansard roof extension, the roof terrace and associated
structures, and the air source heat pump are considered
inappropriate, obtrusive, and unsympathetic additions to the host
building that fail to reflect the original architecture and character of
the building and the terrace that it forms part of. The proposal is,
therefore, contrary to policy LP1 (Design Quality and Local
Character) of Hackney’s Local Plan (2020), policies D3 (Optimising
site layout through the design-led approach) and D4 (Delivering
good design) of the London Plan (2021), and the guidance set out
in Hackney's Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD (2009).
2
The proposed roof terrace, by reason of its size and location,
would create an unacceptable level of overlooking and loss of
privacy for the adjoining occupiers. Accordingly, the terrace is
contrary to policy D3 (Optimising site layout through the design-led
approach) of the London Plan (2021), policy LP2 (Development
and Amenity) of LP33 (2020), and the guidance set out in
Hackney's Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD (2009).
1
The proposed detailed design and fenestration pattern of the
mansard roof extension, the roof terrace and associated
structures, and the air source heat pump are considered
inappropriate, obtrusive, and unsympathetic additions to the host
building that fail to reflect the original architecture and character of
the building and the terrace that it forms part of. The proposal is,
therefore, contrary to policy LP1 (Design Quality and Local
Character) of Hackney’s Local Plan (2020), policies D3 (Optimising
site layout through the design-led approach) and D4 (Delivering
good design) of the London Plan (2021), and the guidance set out
in Hackney's Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD (2009).
2
The proposed roof terrace, by reason of its size and location,
would create an unacceptable level of overlooking and loss of
privacy for the adjoining occupiers. Accordingly, the terrace is
contrary to policy D3 (Optimising site layout through the design-led
approach) of the London Plan (2021), policy LP2 (Development
and Amenity) of LP33 (2020), and the guidance set out in
Hackney's Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD (2009).
Public response
Comment counts were not captured for this application.
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.