Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHackneyLondon Fields Ward wardE8 3LL89 Mapledene Road, Hackney, London, E8 3LL2024/0457
Planning application · Hackney

2024/0457.

89 Mapledene Road, Hackney, London, E8 3LL

Householder at 89 Mapledene Road, Hackney, London, E8 3LL, received 4 Mar 2024 — refused on 29 Apr 2024 (delegated, Jessica Neeve).

ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Refused
Outcome
29 Apr 2024
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
15
Documents
15 linked
0
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of a single-storey ground floor rear infill extension; Erection of a dormer roof rear extension, installation of 2 roof lights to front roof slope

Reference
2024/0457
Type
Householder Planning
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
4 Mar 2024
Target date
29 Apr 2024
Decision date
29 Apr 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Reference
2024/0457
Type
Householder Planning
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
4 Mar 2024
Target date
29 Apr 2024
Decision date
29 Apr 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DN-Householder Refusal Final
29 Apr 2024
Officer Report
29 Apr 2024
Pro plans 1
5 Mar 2024
Ex roof.
5 Mar 2024
Ex Plans
5 Mar 2024
Block plan of the site
5 Mar 2024
Loc Plan
5 Mar 2024
Pro ele
5 Mar 2024
Pro plans 2
5 Mar 2024
Ex Ele
5 Mar 2024
DN-Householder Refusal Final
29 Apr 2024
Officer Report
29 Apr 2024
Pro plans 1
5 Mar 2024
Show all 10 rows
Ex roof.
5 Mar 2024
Ex Plans
5 Mar 2024
Block plan of the site
5 Mar 2024
Loc Plan
5 Mar 2024
Pro ele
5 Mar 2024
Pro plans 2
5 Mar 2024
Ex Ele
5 Mar 2024

Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 29 Apr 2024, delegated decision by Jessica Neeve — 8 weeks from submission.

Timeline

Date
Event
4 Mar 2024
Application received
29 Apr 2024
Statutory target date
29 Apr 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Jessica Neeve
4 Mar 2024
Application received
29 Apr 2024
Statutory target date
29 Apr 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Jessica Neeve

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed rear dormer, by reason of its proportions and detailed design, is an obtrusive, inappropriate, and unsympathetic addition to the property within a terrace that has an unbroken roof line and is, therefore, out of keeping with surrounding development that fails to preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the conservation area and its setting, contrary to policies D3, D4 and HC1 of the London Plan (2021) and policies LP1 and LP3 of Hackney Local Plan (2020) and the advice set out in Hackney's Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD (2009).
1
The proposed rear dormer, by reason of its proportions and detailed design, is an obtrusive, inappropriate, and unsympathetic addition to the property within a terrace that has an unbroken roof line and is, therefore, out of keeping with surrounding development that fails to preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the conservation area and its setting, contrary to policies D3, D4 and HC1 of the London Plan (2021) and policies LP1 and LP3 of Hackney Local Plan (2020) and the advice set out in Hackney's Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD (2009).
Policies cited
D3D4HC1LP1LP3

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
Objections
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.