Planning application · Hackney
2024/0614.
172 Bethune Road, Hackney, London, N16 5DS
Full / Other Planning at 172 Bethune Road, Hackney, London, N16 5DS, received 20 Mar 2024 — refused on 27 Nov 2024 (delegated, Clive Theobald).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Refused
Outcome
27 Nov 2024
36 wks
Decision time
28 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
9
Documents
9 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
The subdivision of the property to create three flats with associated works including the partitioning of the rear garden; cycle storage and refuse enclosure
Reference
2024/0614
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
20 Mar 2024
Validated
10 Apr 2024
Target date
5 Jun 2024
Decision date
27 Nov 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Premises record
Council register
Reference
2024/0614
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 17 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
20 Mar 2024
Validated
10 Apr 2024
Target date
5 Jun 2024
Decision date
27 Nov 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Premises record
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 27 Nov 2024, delegated decision by Clive Theobald — 36 weeks from submission (28 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
20 Mar 2024
Application received
10 Apr 2024
Application validated
5 Jun 2024
Statutory target date
27 Nov 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Clive Theobald
20 Mar 2024
Application received
10 Apr 2024
Application validated
5 Jun 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
27 Nov 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Clive Theobald
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The development would be contrary to policies LP14 B and LP19 B of the
Hackney Local Plan 2033 (2020) as the site is identified as being located
within the Stamford Hill Area Action Plan Area (AAP) and because of this
location fails to provide a 4+ bedroomed family sized dwelling unit at the site
as part of the proposed housing mix as required by these policies and as
required by the Draft Stamford Hill AAP (February 2024) (Reg 19 Stage).
2
The development makes no provision within the submitted scheme for any
biodiversity uplift at the site and is therefore contrary to the biodiversity aims
and objectives of policy G6 of the London Plan (2021) and policy LP47 of the
Hackney Local Plan 2033 (2020) which require such measures and also
contrary to government policy advice and recommendations relating to
biodiversity requirements for new development.
3
The application does not secure any legal mechanism for a S106
agreement in relation to car-free development, restriction on parking permits
(except blue badge), and a commuted sum payment relating to a carbon
offset penalty tariff (£5,737) for the development as required planning
obligations arising from the proposal.
1
The development would be contrary to policies LP14 B and LP19 B of the
Hackney Local Plan 2033 (2020) as the site is identified as being located
within the Stamford Hill Area Action Plan Area (AAP) and because of this
location fails to provide a 4+ bedroomed family sized dwelling unit at the site
as part of the proposed housing mix as required by these policies and as
required by the Draft Stamford Hill AAP (February 2024) (Reg 19 Stage).
2
The development makes no provision within the submitted scheme for any
biodiversity uplift at the site and is therefore contrary to the biodiversity aims
and objectives of policy G6 of the London Plan (2021) and policy LP47 of the
Hackney Local Plan 2033 (2020) which require such measures and also
contrary to government policy advice and recommendations relating to
biodiversity requirements for new development.
3
The application does not secure any legal mechanism for a S106
agreement in relation to car-free development, restriction on parking permits
(except blue badge), and a commuted sum payment relating to a carbon
offset penalty tariff (£5,737) for the development as required planning
obligations arising from the proposal.
Policies cited
G6LP47
Public response
Comment counts were not captured for this application.
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.