Planning application · Hackney
2024/0680.
37 Penshurst Road, Hackney, London, E9 7DT
Householder at 37 Penshurst Road, Hackney, London, E9 7DT, received 27 Mar 2024 — refused on 17 May 2024 (delegated, Matthew Hollins).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Refused
Outcome
17 May 2024
7 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
7
Documents
7 linked
1
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Erection of rear dormer extension
Reference
2024/0680
Type
Householder Planning
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
E9 7DT
Ward
Council
Received
27 Mar 2024
Target date
22 May 2024
Decision date
17 May 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Council register
Reference
2024/0680
Type
Householder Planning
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
E9 7DT
Ward
Council
Received
27 Mar 2024
Target date
22 May 2024
Decision date
17 May 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 17 May 2024, delegated decision by Matthew Hollins — 7 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
27 Mar 2024
Application received
22 May 2024
Statutory target date
17 May 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Matthew Hollins
27 Mar 2024
Application received
22 May 2024
Statutory target date
17 May 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Matthew Hollins
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed rear dormer, by reason of its scale, size and
detailed design, would result in an incompatible form of
development, which would adversely affect the character and
appearance of the host building, the wider terrace within which it is
located and the historic and architectural interest of the Victoria
Park Conservation Area. As such, the proposal is considered
contrary to the policies D1 (London’s form, character and capacity
for growth), D3 (Optimising site capacity through the design-led
approach), D4 (Delivering good design) and HC1 (Heritage
Conservation and growth) of the London Plan (2021) and Policies
LP1 (Design Quality and Local Character) and LP4 (Non
Designated Heritage Assets) of Hackney’s Local Plan 2033 (2020)
and the relevant sections Hackney’s Residential Extensions and
Alterations SPD (2009).
Date of Decision: 17-05-2024
1
The proposed rear dormer, by reason of its scale, size and
detailed design, would result in an incompatible form of
development, which would adversely affect the character and
appearance of the host building, the wider terrace within which it is
located and the historic and architectural interest of the Victoria
Park Conservation Area. As such, the proposal is considered
contrary to the policies D1 (London’s form, character and capacity
for growth), D3 (Optimising site capacity through the design-led
approach), D4 (Delivering good design) and HC1 (Heritage
Conservation and growth) of the London Plan (2021) and Policies
LP1 (Design Quality and Local Character) and LP4 (Non
Designated Heritage Assets) of Hackney’s Local Plan 2033 (2020)
and the relevant sections Hackney’s Residential Extensions and
Alterations SPD (2009).
Date of Decision: 17-05-2024
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
1
Objections
1
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.