Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHackneyHackney Central Ward ward2024/0854
Planning application · Hackney

2024/0854.

ANTON STUDIOS, 2 - 8 Anton Street, Hackney, London, E8 2AD

Full / Other Planning at ANTON STUDIOS, 2 - 8 Anton Street, Hackney, London, E8 2AD, received 19 Apr 2024 — refused on 2 Oct 2024 (delegated, Clive Theobald).

HackneyHackney Central WardE8 2AD2024/0854
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Refused
Outcome
2 Oct 2024
24 wks
Decision time
16 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
13
Documents
13 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Change of use of two commercial units on the ground floor from Use Class E (Commercial, Business and Service) to Use Class C3 to create 2 dwellinghouses.

Reference
2024/0854
Type
Full Planning Permission
Case officer
Postcode
E8 2AD
Council
Received
19 Apr 2024
Target date
14 Jun 2024
Decision date
2 Oct 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Reference
2024/0854
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 15 rows
Case officer
Postcode
E8 2AD
Council
Received
19 Apr 2024
Target date
14 Jun 2024
Decision date
2 Oct 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DN-Full Planning Refusal Final
2 Oct 2024
Officer Report
2 Oct 2024
Concise Energy Statement Anton Street Rev1
22 Apr 2024
Elevation (Front) - Existing
22 Apr 2024
Floor Plan - Existing
22 Apr 2024
The location plan
22 Apr 2024
Accommodation Schedule_P1
22 Apr 2024
Elevation (Side) - Proposed
22 Apr 2024
Proposed Ground Floor Plan_P1
22 Apr 2024
Elevation (Side) - Existing
22 Apr 2024
DN-Full Planning Refusal Final
2 Oct 2024
Officer Report
2 Oct 2024
Concise Energy Statement Anton Street Rev1
22 Apr 2024
Show all 10 rows
Elevation (Front) - Existing
22 Apr 2024
Floor Plan - Existing
22 Apr 2024
The location plan
22 Apr 2024
Accommodation Schedule_P1
22 Apr 2024
Elevation (Side) - Proposed
22 Apr 2024
Proposed Ground Floor Plan_P1
22 Apr 2024
Elevation (Side) - Existing
22 Apr 2024

Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 2 Oct 2024, delegated decision by Clive Theobald — 24 weeks from submission (16 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
19 Apr 2024
Application received
14 Jun 2024
Statutory target date
2 Oct 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Clive Theobald
19 Apr 2024
Application received
14 Jun 2024
Statutory target date
2 Oct 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Clive Theobald

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposal would result in an unacceptable and unjustified loss of employment floorspace in the Anton Street Priority Industrial Area, thereby failing to ensure the retention of an adequate stock of industrial floorspace to support Hackney's diverse, adaptable, and more sustainable economy. As such, the proposal is considered unacceptable in principle and fails to comply with policies LP26 (Employment Land and Floorspace), LP27 (Protecting and Promoting Office Floorspace in the Borough) and LP28 (Protecting and Promoting Industrial Land and Floorspace in the Borough) of the Hackney Local Plan LP33 (2020), and policies E6 (Locally significant industrial sites) and E7 (Industrial intensification, co-location, and substitution) of the London Plan (2021).
2
The proposed development, by reason of its lack of affordable housing contribution or demonstration that this cannot be met, fails to meet the borough's demand for affordable housing and therefore fails to comply with policy LP13 of the Hackney Local Plan LP33 (2020) and the Planning Contributions SPD (2020).
3
It is likely that the frequency of vehicles accessing the rear car park and the close proximity of the existing enclosed commercial/resident refuse storage areas would harm the useability of the indicated private amenity spaces to the rear of the proposed units whereby future occupants of the units would likely be impacted through noise, disturbance, smells and fumes whilst occupying these amenity spaces. The proposed development would therefore be contrary to policies D6 and SI 1 of the London Plan (2021) and policies LP2 and LP58 of the Hackney Local Plan (LP33).
1
The proposal would result in an unacceptable and unjustified loss of employment floorspace in the Anton Street Priority Industrial Area, thereby failing to ensure the retention of an adequate stock of industrial floorspace to support Hackney's diverse, adaptable, and more sustainable economy. As such, the proposal is considered unacceptable in principle and fails to comply with policies LP26 (Employment Land and Floorspace), LP27 (Protecting and Promoting Office Floorspace in the Borough) and LP28 (Protecting and Promoting Industrial Land and Floorspace in the Borough) of the Hackney Local Plan LP33 (2020), and policies E6 (Locally significant industrial sites) and E7 (Industrial intensification, co-location, and substitution) of the London Plan (2021).
2
The proposed development, by reason of its lack of affordable housing contribution or demonstration that this cannot be met, fails to meet the borough's demand for affordable housing and therefore fails to comply with policy LP13 of the Hackney Local Plan LP33 (2020) and the Planning Contributions SPD (2020).
3
It is likely that the frequency of vehicles accessing the rear car park and the close proximity of the existing enclosed commercial/resident refuse storage areas would harm the useability of the indicated private amenity spaces to the rear of the proposed units whereby future occupants of the units would likely be impacted through noise, disturbance, smells and fumes whilst occupying these amenity spaces. The proposed development would therefore be contrary to policies D6 and SI 1 of the London Plan (2021) and policies LP2 and LP58 of the Hackney Local Plan (LP33).
Policies cited
LP13D6SI1LP2LP58

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.