Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHackneyHoxton East and Shoreditch Ward ward2024/1278
Planning application · Hackney

2024/1278.

SAPLING HOUSE, 103 Worship Street, Hackney, London, EC2A 2DF

Full / Other Planning at SAPLING HOUSE, 103 Worship Street, Hackney, London, EC2A 2DF, received 18 Jun 2024 — refused on 18 Sep 2024 (delegated, Danny Huber).

HackneyHoxton East and Shoreditch WardEC2A 2DF2024/1278
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Refused
Outcome
18 Sep 2024
13 wks
Decision time
5 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
18
Documents
18 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Alterations to shopfront

Reference
2024/1278
Type
Full Planning Permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
EC2A 2DF
Council
Received
18 Jun 2024
Validated
9 Jul 2024
Target date
18 Sep 2024
Decision date
18 Sep 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Reference
2024/1278
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
EC2A 2DF
Council
Received
18 Jun 2024
Validated
9 Jul 2024
Target date
18 Sep 2024
Decision date
18 Sep 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Final Officer Report
18 Sept 2024
DN-Full Planning Refusal Final
18 Sept 2024
Mixed/Combined Plans
19 Jun 2024
Block plan of the site
19 Jun 2024
Community Infrastructure Levy - Completed form
19 Jun 2024
Design and access statement
19 Jun 2024
Section - Proposed
19 Jun 2024
Section - Existing
19 Jun 2024
Section - Proposed
19 Jun 2024
Section - Existing
19 Jun 2024
Final Officer Report
18 Sept 2024
DN-Full Planning Refusal Final
18 Sept 2024
Mixed/Combined Plans
19 Jun 2024
Show all 10 rows
Block plan of the site
19 Jun 2024
Community Infrastructure Levy - Completed form
19 Jun 2024
Design and access statement
19 Jun 2024
Section - Proposed
19 Jun 2024
Section - Existing
19 Jun 2024
Section - Proposed
19 Jun 2024
Section - Existing
19 Jun 2024

Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 18 Sep 2024, delegated decision by Danny Huber — 13 weeks from submission (5 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
18 Jun 2024
Application received
9 Jul 2024
Application validated
18 Sep 2024
Statutory target date
18 Sep 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Danny Huber
18 Jun 2024
Application received
9 Jul 2024
Application validated
18 Sep 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
18 Sep 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Danny Huber

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed shopfront alteration appears as an incongruous form of development which fails to respect the proportions of the glazing and stallriser and the traditional character of the shopfront, harming the special interest of the individual Listed Building and the overall group value of Listed Buildings at 91-105 Worship Street. As such the development is contrary to Policy HC1 (Heritage and Growth) of the London Plan (2021) and Policy LP3 (Designated Heritage Assets) of the Hackney Local Plan (2020).
1
The proposed shopfront alteration appears as an incongruous form of development which fails to respect the proportions of the glazing and stallriser and the traditional character of the shopfront, harming the special interest of the individual Listed Building and the overall group value of Listed Buildings at 91-105 Worship Street. As such the development is contrary to Policy HC1 (Heritage and Growth) of the London Plan (2021) and Policy LP3 (Designated Heritage Assets) of the Hackney Local Plan (2020).

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.