Planning application · Hackney
2024/1375.
76 Mortimer Road, Hackney, London, N1 5AP
Householder at 76 Mortimer Road, Hackney, London, N1 5AP, received 26 Jun 2024 — refused on 21 Aug 2024 (delegated, Jackson Morgan).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Refused
Outcome
21 Aug 2024
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
17
Documents
17 linked
0
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Erection of lower ground floor extension. Creation of terrace above extension. Alteration of window to rear facade at Upper Ground Floor level to create door to allow access to terrace.
Reference
2024/1375
Type
Householder Planning
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N1 5AP
Ward
Council
Received
26 Jun 2024
Target date
21 Aug 2024
Decision date
21 Aug 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Council register
Reference
2024/1375
Type
Householder Planning
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
N1 5AP
Ward
Council
Received
26 Jun 2024
Target date
21 Aug 2024
Decision date
21 Aug 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 21 Aug 2024, delegated decision by Jackson Morgan — 8 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
26 Jun 2024
Application received
21 Aug 2024
Statutory target date
21 Aug 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Jackson Morgan
26 Jun 2024
Application received
21 Aug 2024
Statutory target date
21 Aug 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Jackson Morgan
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed rear terrace, associated balustrade and
replacement of the rear first floor sash window with a door, by
reason of the loss of an original architectural feature and resulting
in an over cluttered, incongruous and discordant form of
development, would harm to the significance of the locally listed
host building and would fail to preserve or enhance the character
and appearance of the De Beauvoir Conservation Area. The
development is contrary to Policies LP1 (Design Quality and Local
Character), LP3 (Designated Heritage Assets) and LP4 (Non
Designated Heritage Assets) of the Local Plan 2033 (2020), Policy
D3 (Optimising site capacity through the design-led approach) and
HC1 (Heritage conservation and growth) of the London Plan
(2021) and the relevant sections of the Residential Extensions and
Alterations Supplementary Planning Document (REA SPD) (2009).
2
The proposed terrace and privacy screens, by reason of their
height, location and proximity to neighbouring habitable spaces,
would result in undue or excessive overbearing and overlooking
whereby the living conditions and privacy of neighbouring
occupiers would be subject to significant adverse impacts. The
development is contrary to Policy LP2 (Development and Amenity)
of Local Plan 2033 (2020), Policy D3 (Optimising site capacity
through the design-led approach) of the London Plan (2021) and
the relevant sections of the Residential Extensions and Alterations
Supplementary Planning Document (REA SPD) (2009).
3
The proposed rear terrace, by reason of its size, location and
proximity to adjoining habitable residential windows, would result in
adverse noise and disturbance impacts to adjoining residential
occupiers to the detriment of their living conditions, contrary to
Policies LP2 (Development and Amenity) and LP58 (Improving the
Environment - Pollution) of Local Plan 2033 (2020), Policies D3
(Optimising site capacity through the design-led approach) and
D14 (Noise) of the London Plan (2021) and the relevant sections
of the Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary
Planning Document (REA SPD) (2009).
Date of Decision: 21-08-2024
1
The proposed rear terrace, associated balustrade and
replacement of the rear first floor sash window with a door, by
reason of the loss of an original architectural feature and resulting
in an over cluttered, incongruous and discordant form of
development, would harm to the significance of the locally listed
host building and would fail to preserve or enhance the character
and appearance of the De Beauvoir Conservation Area. The
development is contrary to Policies LP1 (Design Quality and Local
Character), LP3 (Designated Heritage Assets) and LP4 (Non
Designated Heritage Assets) of the Local Plan 2033 (2020), Policy
D3 (Optimising site capacity through the design-led approach) and
HC1 (Heritage conservation and growth) of the London Plan
(2021) and the relevant sections of the Residential Extensions and
Alterations Supplementary Planning Document (REA SPD) (2009).
2
The proposed terrace and privacy screens, by reason of their
height, location and proximity to neighbouring habitable spaces,
would result in undue or excessive overbearing and overlooking
whereby the living conditions and privacy of neighbouring
occupiers would be subject to significant adverse impacts. The
development is contrary to Policy LP2 (Development and Amenity)
of Local Plan 2033 (2020), Policy D3 (Optimising site capacity
through the design-led approach) of the London Plan (2021) and
the relevant sections of the Residential Extensions and Alterations
Supplementary Planning Document (REA SPD) (2009).
3
The proposed rear terrace, by reason of its size, location and
proximity to adjoining habitable residential windows, would result in
adverse noise and disturbance impacts to adjoining residential
occupiers to the detriment of their living conditions, contrary to
Policies LP2 (Development and Amenity) and LP58 (Improving the
Environment - Pollution) of Local Plan 2033 (2020), Policies D3
(Optimising site capacity through the design-led approach) and
D14 (Noise) of the London Plan (2021) and the relevant sections
of the Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary
Planning Document (REA SPD) (2009).
Date of Decision: 21-08-2024
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
Objections
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.