Planning application · Hackney
2024/1990.
Jacobs Newsagent & Off-licence, 46 Stoke Newington Road, Hackney, London, N16 7XJ
Full / Other Planning at Jacobs Newsagent & Off-licence, 46 Stoke Newington Road, Hackney, London, N16 7XJ, received 12 Sep 2024 — refused on 17 Feb 2025 (delegated, Simone Ward).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Refused
Outcome
17 Feb 2025
23 wks
Decision time
15 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
14
Documents
14 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Erection of a second floor and mansard roof extension together with ground and first floor rear extension together with associated alterations including roof terrace to provide a 6 bedroom 7 occupant HMO (Sui Generis).
Reference
2024/1990
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
12 Sep 2024
Validated
20 Dec 2024
Target date
14 Feb 2025
Decision date
17 Feb 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Premises record
Council register
Reference
2024/1990
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 17 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Not recorded
Council
Received
12 Sep 2024
Validated
20 Dec 2024
Target date
14 Feb 2025
Decision date
17 Feb 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Premises record
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 17 Feb 2025, delegated decision by Simone Ward — 23 weeks from submission (15 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
12 Sep 2024
Application received
20 Dec 2024
Application validated
14 Feb 2025
Statutory target date
17 Feb 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Simone Ward
12 Sep 2024
Application received
20 Dec 2024
Application validated
14 Feb 2025
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
17 Feb 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Simone Ward
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
In the absence of an air quality assessment, insufficient information has
been provided to assess compliance with policy SI 1 (Improving Air Quality) of
the London Plan (2021) and policy LP58 (Improving the Environment -
Pollution) of Hackney’s Local Plan 2033 (2020)
2
Insufficient information has been provided to determine whether the local
noise environment would have an acceptable impact on the amenity of future
occupiers contrary to policy LP2 (Development and Amenity) of Hackney’s
Local Plan 2033 (2020)
3
In the absence of a Unilateral Undertaking or a Section 106 Agreement
(S106) to secure appropriate rent levels in accordance with the Local Housing
Allowance, the development would fail to secure the proposed HMO at an
affordable rent level, contrary to Policy LP22 of the Hackney Local Plan 2033
(2020).
4
In the absence of a Unilateral Undertaking or a Section 106 agreement
securing appropriate mitigation by restricting future occupiers of the
development from obtaining parking permits within the Controlled Parking
Zone the proposed development would likely exacerbate existing parking
stress and congestion on the surrounding highway network. The application
is, therefore, contrary to Policy LP45 of the Hackney Local Plan 2033 (2020)
and Policy T6 of the London Plan (2021).
5
In the absence of a Unilateral Undertaking or Section 106 Agreement to
secure a payment in lieu for carbon off-setting, the proposal would fail to
actively mitigate the impact of climate change, contrary to policies SI 2
(Minimising greenhouse gas emissions) and SI 4 (Managing heat risk) of the
London Plan (2021) and policies LP54 (Overheating) and LP55 (Mitigating
Climate Change) of Hackney’s Local Plan 2033 (2020) and Hackney's S106
Planning Contributions SPD (2020).
1
In the absence of an air quality assessment, insufficient information has
been provided to assess compliance with policy SI 1 (Improving Air Quality) of
the London Plan (2021) and policy LP58 (Improving the Environment -
Pollution) of Hackney’s Local Plan 2033 (2020)
2
Insufficient information has been provided to determine whether the local
noise environment would have an acceptable impact on the amenity of future
occupiers contrary to policy LP2 (Development and Amenity) of Hackney’s
Local Plan 2033 (2020)
3
In the absence of a Unilateral Undertaking or a Section 106 Agreement
(S106) to secure appropriate rent levels in accordance with the Local Housing
Allowance, the development would fail to secure the proposed HMO at an
affordable rent level, contrary to Policy LP22 of the Hackney Local Plan 2033
(2020).
Show all 5 rows
4
In the absence of a Unilateral Undertaking or a Section 106 agreement
securing appropriate mitigation by restricting future occupiers of the
development from obtaining parking permits within the Controlled Parking
Zone the proposed development would likely exacerbate existing parking
stress and congestion on the surrounding highway network. The application
is, therefore, contrary to Policy LP45 of the Hackney Local Plan 2033 (2020)
and Policy T6 of the London Plan (2021).
5
In the absence of a Unilateral Undertaking or Section 106 Agreement to
secure a payment in lieu for carbon off-setting, the proposal would fail to
actively mitigate the impact of climate change, contrary to policies SI 2
(Minimising greenhouse gas emissions) and SI 4 (Managing heat risk) of the
London Plan (2021) and policies LP54 (Overheating) and LP55 (Mitigating
Climate Change) of Hackney’s Local Plan 2033 (2020) and Hackney's S106
Planning Contributions SPD (2020).
Policies cited
LP22LP45T6
Public response
Comment counts were not captured for this application.
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.