Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHackneyLondon Fields Ward ward2025/0025
Planning application · Hackney

2025/0025.

Hek Umut Ltd, 61 - 63 Westgate Street, Hackney, London, E8 3RL

Full / Other Planning at Hek Umut Ltd, 61 - 63 Westgate Street, Hackney, London, E8 3RL, received 6 Jan 2025 — refused on 31 Mar 2025 (delegated, Lorraine Murphy).

HackneyLondon Fields WardE8 3RL2025/0025
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Refused
Outcome
31 Mar 2025
12 wks
Decision time
4 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
28
Documents
28 linked
0
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Creation of a permanent outdoor trading area to the front of the premises to include fixed canopy and glazed side panels.

Reference
2025/0025
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
E8 3RL
Council
Received
6 Jan 2025
Validated
3 Feb 2025
Target date
31 Mar 2025
Decision date
31 Mar 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Reference
2025/0025
Type
Full Planning Permission
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
E8 3RL
Council
Received
6 Jan 2025
Validated
3 Feb 2025
Target date
31 Mar 2025
Decision date
31 Mar 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DN-Full Planning Refusal Final
31 Mar 2025
Officer Report
31 Mar 2025
Design and Access statement
3 Feb 2025
Community Infrastructure Levy - Completed form
8 Jan 2025
Other relevant information
8 Jan 2025
Other relevant information
8 Jan 2025
Planning obligations
8 Jan 2025
Other relevant information
8 Jan 2025
Covering letter
8 Jan 2025
Other relevant information
8 Jan 2025
DN-Full Planning Refusal Final
31 Mar 2025
Officer Report
31 Mar 2025
Design and Access statement
3 Feb 2025
Show all 10 rows
Community Infrastructure Levy - Completed form
8 Jan 2025
Other relevant information
8 Jan 2025
Other relevant information
8 Jan 2025
Planning obligations
8 Jan 2025
Other relevant information
8 Jan 2025
Covering letter
8 Jan 2025
Other relevant information
8 Jan 2025

Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 31 Mar 2025, delegated decision by Lorraine Murphy — 12 weeks from submission (4 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
6 Jan 2025
Application received
3 Feb 2025
Application validated
31 Mar 2025
Statutory target date
31 Mar 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Lorraine Murphy
6 Jan 2025
Application received
3 Feb 2025
Application validated
31 Mar 2025
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
31 Mar 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Lorraine Murphy

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development, by reason of its inappropriate design, materials, scale, and appearance, would result in an incongruous, overly prominent and discordant addition that would fail to preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the site and wider Broadway Market Conservation Area, contrary to Policies D3 (Optimising site capacity through the design led approach), HC1 (Heritage Conservation and Growth) of the London Plan (2021), Policies LP1 (High Quality Design), LP3 (Designated Heritage Assets) of the Hackney Local Plan (2020) and the Hackney Shopfront Design Guide SPG
2
The proposed development, by reason of its inappropriate scale, form and location, would result in an unacceptable narrowing of the public footpath in a busy prominent location, which would detrimentally impact pedestrian movement, public realm accessibility and create conflicts between different users.The works would therefore negatively affect the quality and usability of the public realm and safety of pedestrians, contrary to Policies D8 (Public Realm), T5 (Cycling) of the London Plan (2021), Policies LP1 (High Quality Design), PP1 (Public Realm), LP41 (Liveable Neighbourhoods), LP42 (Walking and Cycling) and LP43 (Transport and Development) of the Hackney Local Plan (2020) Date of Decision: 31-03-2025
1
The proposed development, by reason of its inappropriate design, materials, scale, and appearance, would result in an incongruous, overly prominent and discordant addition that would fail to preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the site and wider Broadway Market Conservation Area, contrary to Policies D3 (Optimising site capacity through the design led approach), HC1 (Heritage Conservation and Growth) of the London Plan (2021), Policies LP1 (High Quality Design), LP3 (Designated Heritage Assets) of the Hackney Local Plan (2020) and the Hackney Shopfront Design Guide SPG
2
The proposed development, by reason of its inappropriate scale, form and location, would result in an unacceptable narrowing of the public footpath in a busy prominent location, which would detrimentally impact pedestrian movement, public realm accessibility and create conflicts between different users.The works would therefore negatively affect the quality and usability of the public realm and safety of pedestrians, contrary to Policies D8 (Public Realm), T5 (Cycling) of the London Plan (2021), Policies LP1 (High Quality Design), PP1 (Public Realm), LP41 (Liveable Neighbourhoods), LP42 (Walking and Cycling) and LP43 (Transport and Development) of the Hackney Local Plan (2020) Date of Decision: 31-03-2025

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
Objections
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.