1
The proposed development, which would involve a high number of patrons
attending events of a wide variety of description, would result in significant
adverse noise and disturbance impacts. In addition it would cause noise
disturbance to the adjacent Mark Street Gardens. This would be detrimental
to the living conditions of nearby residential occupiers and of use of the
Gardens by the community, conflicting with Policies LP2 (Development and
Amenity), LP38 (Evening and Night Time Economy) and LP58 (Improving the
Environment - Pollution) of the Hackney Local Plan (2020). Furthermore, it
fails to meet the standards set out in D14 (Noise) of the London Plan (2021),
which aim to protect residential amenity from excessive noise.
2
The proposed development, by reason of the high number of patrons, the
narrowness of the surrounding highways and an absence of adequate
submitted documents in relation to Transport impacts, would result in
unacceptable impacts to the local Highways network. As such the proposed
development is contrary to London Plan (2021) policies T3 (Transport
capacity, connectivity and safeguarding), T4 (Assessing and mitigating
transport impacts), T5 (Cycling), T6 (Car parking) and T7 (Deliveries,
servicing and construction) and Hackney Local Plan (2020) policies LP42
(Walking and Cycling), LP43 (Transport and Development), LP44 (Public
Transport and Infrastructure) and LP45 (Parking and Car Free Development)
3
The proposed development, which does not include level access to and
from the venue and which has its toilets outside the venue without level
access shown on the submitted drawings, is not properly inclusive or
accessible. As such the proposed development is contrary to London Plan
(2021) Policy D5 (Inclusive design) and Local Plan Policy LP1 (Design quality
and Local Character).
4
The proposed development, which relies on a single width stair for the
entrance and egress of patrons, which is supported by an out of date Fire
Safety Report, and which does not include emergency lighting, fire alarms
and fire safety signage that would also require Listed Building Consent, is
considered to be contrary London Plan (2021) Policy D12 (Fire Safety).
Date of Decision: 11-06-2025
1
The proposed development, which would involve a high number of patrons
attending events of a wide variety of description, would result in significant
adverse noise and disturbance impacts. In addition it would cause noise
disturbance to the adjacent Mark Street Gardens. This would be detrimental
to the living conditions of nearby residential occupiers and of use of the
Gardens by the community, conflicting with Policies LP2 (Development and
Amenity), LP38 (Evening and Night Time Economy) and LP58 (Improving the
Environment - Pollution) of the Hackney Local Plan (2020). Furthermore, it
fails to meet the standards set out in D14 (Noise) of the London Plan (2021),
which aim to protect residential amenity from excessive noise.
2
The proposed development, by reason of the high number of patrons, the
narrowness of the surrounding highways and an absence of adequate
submitted documents in relation to Transport impacts, would result in
unacceptable impacts to the local Highways network. As such the proposed
development is contrary to London Plan (2021) policies T3 (Transport
capacity, connectivity and safeguarding), T4 (Assessing and mitigating
transport impacts), T5 (Cycling), T6 (Car parking) and T7 (Deliveries,
servicing and construction) and Hackney Local Plan (2020) policies LP42
(Walking and Cycling), LP43 (Transport and Development), LP44 (Public
Transport and Infrastructure) and LP45 (Parking and Car Free Development)
3
The proposed development, which does not include level access to and
from the venue and which has its toilets outside the venue without level
access shown on the submitted drawings, is not properly inclusive or
accessible. As such the proposed development is contrary to London Plan
(2021) Policy D5 (Inclusive design) and Local Plan Policy LP1 (Design quality
and Local Character).
Show all 4 rows
4
The proposed development, which relies on a single width stair for the
entrance and egress of patrons, which is supported by an out of date Fire
Safety Report, and which does not include emergency lighting, fire alarms
and fire safety signage that would also require Listed Building Consent, is
considered to be contrary London Plan (2021) Policy D12 (Fire Safety).
Date of Decision: 11-06-2025