Planning application · Hackney
2025/0559.
108 Rushmore Road, Hackney, London, E5 0EX
Householder at 108 Rushmore Road, Hackney, London, E5 0EX, received 11 Mar 2025 — refused on 8 May 2025 (delegated, Louise Jarrett).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Refused
Outcome
8 May 2025
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
13
Documents
13 linked
0
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Erection of mansard roof extension
Reference
2025/0559
Type
Householder Planning
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
11 Mar 2025
Validated
13 Mar 2025
Target date
8 May 2025
Decision date
8 May 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Premises record
Council register
Reference
2025/0559
Type
Householder Planning
Show all 17 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
11 Mar 2025
Validated
13 Mar 2025
Target date
8 May 2025
Decision date
8 May 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Premises record
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 8 May 2025, delegated decision by Louise Jarrett — 8 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
11 Mar 2025
Application received
13 Mar 2025
Application validated
8 May 2025
Statutory target date
8 May 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Louise Jarrett
11 Mar 2025
Application received
13 Mar 2025
Application validated
8 May 2025
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
8 May 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Louise Jarrett
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed mansard roof extension, by reason of its size,
scale, location and detailed design, would result in the loss of the
original roof form within a terrace with an unbroken roof line and
would result in an overly dominant and obtrusive form of
development that fails to respect the character and appearance of
the host property and the wider terrace it forms part of. As such,
the proposed development is contrary to policies D3 (Optimising
Site Capacity through the Design-led Approach) and D4
(Delivering good design) of the London Plan (2021) and policies
LP1 (Design Quality and Local Character) and LP17 (Housing
Design) of the Hackney Local Plan 2033 (2020) and the guidance
contained within Hackney Residential Extensions and Alterations
SPD (2009).
Date of Decision: 08-05-2025
1
The proposed mansard roof extension, by reason of its size,
scale, location and detailed design, would result in the loss of the
original roof form within a terrace with an unbroken roof line and
would result in an overly dominant and obtrusive form of
development that fails to respect the character and appearance of
the host property and the wider terrace it forms part of. As such,
the proposed development is contrary to policies D3 (Optimising
Site Capacity through the Design-led Approach) and D4
(Delivering good design) of the London Plan (2021) and policies
LP1 (Design Quality and Local Character) and LP17 (Housing
Design) of the Hackney Local Plan 2033 (2020) and the guidance
contained within Hackney Residential Extensions and Alterations
SPD (2009).
Date of Decision: 08-05-2025
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
Objections
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.