Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHackneyCazenove Ward wardN16 6XA31 Lampard Grove, Hackney, London, N16 6XA2025/0656
Planning application · Hackney

2025/0656.

31 Lampard Grove, Hackney, London, N16 6XA

Householder at 31 Lampard Grove, Hackney, London, N16 6XA, received 19 Mar 2025 — refused on 25 Jun 2025 (delegated, Lorraine Murphy).

HackneyCazenove WardN16 6XA2025/0656
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Refused
Outcome
25 Jun 2025
14 wks
Decision time
6 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
8
Documents
8 linked
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of a part one-storey, part two-storey rear extension

Reference
2025/0656
Type
Householder Planning
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
19 Mar 2025
Target date
26 Jun 2025
Decision date
25 Jun 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Reference
2025/0656
Type
Householder Planning
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
19 Mar 2025
Target date
26 Jun 2025
Decision date
25 Jun 2025
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
-Appeal-Decision
17 Dec 2025
Appeal-Statement
1 Jul 2025
APPEAL-FORM
1 Jul 2025
DN-Householder Refusal Final
25 Jun 2025
Officer Report
25 Jun 2025
form_1_cil_additional_information.pdf
20 Mar 2025
Existing & Proposed drawings
20 Mar 2025
ApplicationFormRedacted.pdf
20 Mar 2025
-Appeal-Decision
17 Dec 2025
Appeal-Statement
1 Jul 2025
APPEAL-FORM
1 Jul 2025
Show all 8 rows
DN-Householder Refusal Final
25 Jun 2025
Officer Report
25 Jun 2025
form_1_cil_additional_information.pdf
20 Mar 2025
Existing & Proposed drawings
20 Mar 2025
ApplicationFormRedacted.pdf
20 Mar 2025

Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 25 Jun 2025, delegated decision by Lorraine Murphy — 14 weeks from submission (6 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
19 Mar 2025
Application received
26 Jun 2025
Statutory target date
25 Jun 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Lorraine Murphy
19 Mar 2025
Application received
26 Jun 2025
Statutory target date
25 Jun 2025
Delegated decision: Refused · Lorraine Murphy

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed two storey rear extension, by reason of its inappropriate design, excessive scale and bulk would be an unsympathetic and visually intrusive form of development, failing to respect the character and appearance of the hosting dwelling and the wider terrace, where such proposals are an uncharacteristic feature. The proposal is considered to be contrary to policies D3 (Optimising site capacity through the design led approach), policies LP1 (Design Quality and Local Character) of the Hackney Local Plan 2033, Stamford Hill AAP (Consultation version) policies AAP3 (Residential Extensions and Alterations), AAP6 (Delivering High Quality Design) and the Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD 2009. Date of Decision: 25-06-2025
1
The proposed two storey rear extension, by reason of its inappropriate design, excessive scale and bulk would be an unsympathetic and visually intrusive form of development, failing to respect the character and appearance of the hosting dwelling and the wider terrace, where such proposals are an uncharacteristic feature. The proposal is considered to be contrary to policies D3 (Optimising site capacity through the design led approach), policies LP1 (Design Quality and Local Character) of the Hackney Local Plan 2033, Stamford Hill AAP (Consultation version) policies AAP3 (Residential Extensions and Alterations), AAP6 (Delivering High Quality Design) and the Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD 2009. Date of Decision: 25-06-2025

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.