Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHackneyWick (P) ward15-49 CHAPMAN ROAD (OPPOSITE JUNCTION WITH TROWBRIDGE RD & FELSTEAD RD) LONDON E9NORTH/38/96/ADV
Planning application · Hackney

NORTH/38/96/ADV.

15-49 CHAPMAN ROAD (OPPOSITE JUNCTION WITH TROWBRIDGE RD & FELSTEAD RD) LONDON E9

Advertisement at 15-49 CHAPMAN ROAD (OPPOSITE JUNCTION WITH TROWBRIDGE RD & FELSTEAD RD) LONDON E9, received 1 Feb 1996 — approved on 23 May 1996 (delegated, MMJ MJ).

HackneyWick (P)NORTH/38/96/ADV
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Approved
Outcome
23 May 1996
16 wks
Decision time
8 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

erection of 2 48 sheet and 1 96 sheet advertisement hoardings plus fencing

Reference
NORTH/38/96/ADV
Type
Advertisement Consent
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
1 Feb 1996
Target date
28 Mar 1996
Decision date
23 May 1996
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Reference
NORTH/38/96/ADV
Type
Advertisement Consent
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
1 Feb 1996
Target date
28 Mar 1996
Decision date
23 May 1996
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 23 May 1996, delegated decision by MMJ MJ — 16 weeks from submission (8 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
1 Feb 1996
Application received
28 Mar 1996
Statutory target date
23 May 1996
Delegated decision: Approved · MMJ MJ
1 Feb 1996
Application received
28 Mar 1996
Statutory target date
23 May 1996
Delegated decision: Approved · MMJ MJ

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.