Planning application · Hackney
NORTH/640/99/CLU.
Lawful Development Certificate at 5 LECONFIELD ROAD LONDON N5, received 29 Nov 1999 — approved on 2 Feb 2000 (delegated, RRP RP).
No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationHackney profile →
Approved
Outcome
2 Feb 2000
9 wks
Decision time
1 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
4
Documents
4 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Hackney planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
certificate of lawfullness for rear extensions
Reference
NORTH/640/99/CLU
Type
Certificate of Lawful Development Existing/Proposed
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
29 Nov 1999
Validated
5 Jan 2000
Target date
24 Jan 2000
Decision date
2 Feb 2000
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Premises record
Council register
Reference
NORTH/640/99/CLU
Type
Certificate of Lawful Development Existing/Proposed
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Ward
Council
Received
29 Nov 1999
Validated
5 Jan 2000
Target date
24 Jan 2000
Decision date
2 Feb 2000
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Final Decision
Premises record
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Hackney portal. View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Approved on 2 Feb 2000, delegated decision by RRP RP — 9 weeks from submission (1 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
29 Nov 1999
Application received
5 Jan 2000
Application validated
24 Jan 2000
Statutory target date
2 Feb 2000
Delegated decision: Approved · RRP RP
29 Nov 1999
Application received
5 Jan 2000
Application validated
24 Jan 2000
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
2 Feb 2000
Delegated decision: Approved · RRP RP
Public response
Comment counts were not captured for this application.
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.