Planning Atlas
AtlasHackneyWardsChatham
Planning AtlasHackneyCHATHAM
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityAppeals
Ward · London Borough of Hackney

CHATHAM.

CHATHAM sees an approval rate of across 107 substantive planning decisions, with a refusal rate of 0.0%.[1]

Hackney107 applications
Postcodes (centres) shaded by approval rate · click one to open it
Showing
All years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
107
Applications 1990–15
Decided applications
Approval rate
Borough avg 76%
0.0%
Refusal rate
43rd highest of 57
8.7
Avg decision time
Wks · borough avg 9.2
Data from publicly available Hackney planning records and committee minutes, 1990–15.
Ward overview

CHATHAM recorded 107 substantive planning decisions over 1990–15, approving of them — in line with the Hackney borough average of 76%. Its refusal rate of 0.0% is 43rd highest of 57.

Application and refusal breakdown— subscriber data
Residential extension / alteration
New residential
Change of use
Commercial development
Recent planning decisions— subscriber data
Reference
Address
Type
Outcome
Date
Committee members for this ward
Councillor
Party
Role
Interventions
Success rate
Cllr Mark Williams
Labour
Planning committee
23
47%
Cllr Emma Torres
Labour
Ward member
6
33%
Cllr Mark Williams
Labour
Planning committee
23
47%
Cllr Emma Torres
Labour
Ward member
6
33%

Interventions: formal calls to bring an application before committee. Success rate: percentage where the committee sided with the councillor against officer recommendation.

At a glance[1]
WardCHATHAM
CouncilHackney
Applications107 (1990–15)
Approval rate
Refusal rate0.0%
Decision time8.7 wks avg
Ward members2 (both Labour)
Planning constraints[2]
Conservation areas2
Article 4 directions2
Listed buildings17
TPO trees43
Flood zoneZone 1 (low)
Sources & method
  1. [1]Ward approval and refusal rates, application counts and decision-time figures — London Borough of Hackney planning register and published decision notices, 1990–15. · methodology
  2. [2]Conservation areas, Article 4 directions and heritage designations — the borough’s adopted Local Plan and conservation-area appraisals.
  3. [3]Committee interventions and councillor records — public planning committee minutes and published decision notices.
  4. [4]Application-type mix and refusal grounds — case-officer reports coded against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.