Ward · London Borough of Hackney
Chatham (L).
Chatham (L) sees an approval rate of 75% — 1 points below the Hackney average across 1,236 substantive planning decisions, with a refusal rate of 24.9%.[1]
Hackney1,236 applications
Postcodes (centres) shaded by approval rate · click one to open it
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
1,236
Applications 1996–14
Decided applications
75%
Approval rate
1pp below borough avg (76%)
24.9%
Refusal rate
12th highest of 57
8.7
Avg decision time
Wks · borough avg 9.2
Data from publicly available Hackney planning records and committee minutes, 1996–14.
Ward overview
Chatham (L) recorded 1,236 substantive planning decisions over 1996–14, approving 75% of them — 1 percentage points below the Hackney borough average of 76%. Its refusal rate of 24.9% is 12th highest of 57.
Application and refusal breakdown— subscriber data
Residential extension / alteration
New residential
Change of use
Commercial development
Recent planning decisions— subscriber data
Committee members for this ward
Councillor
Party
Role
Interventions
Success rate
Cllr Mark Williams
Labour
Planning committee
23
47%
Cllr Emma Torres
Labour
Ward member
6
33%
Cllr Mark Williams
Labour
Planning committee
23
47%
Cllr Emma Torres
Labour
Ward member
6
33%
Interventions: formal calls to bring an application before committee. Success rate: percentage where the committee sided with the councillor against officer recommendation.
Sources & method
- [1]Ward approval and refusal rates, application counts and decision-time figures — London Borough of Hackney planning register and published decision notices, 1996–14. · methodology
- [2]Conservation areas, Article 4 directions and heritage designations — the borough’s adopted Local Plan and conservation-area appraisals.
- [3]Committee interventions and councillor records — public planning committee minutes and published decision notices.
- [4]Application-type mix and refusal grounds — case-officer reports coded against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.