Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHarrowRoxbourne wardP/0865/07
Planning application · Harrow

P/0865/07.

120 Eastcote Lane, Harrow, HA2 9BJ

Full / Other Planning at 120 Eastcote Lane, Harrow, HA2 9BJ, received 21 Mar 2007 — refused on 12 Jun 2007 (delegated, AG Andeep Gill).

HarrowRoxbourneHA2 9BJP/0865/07
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHarrow profile →
Refused
Outcome
12 Jun 2007
12 wks
Decision time
4 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Harrow planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

SINGLE STOREY REAR EXTENSION

Reference
P/0865/07
Type
Full Planning Application
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
HA2 9BJ
Council
Received
21 Mar 2007
Validated
22 Mar 2007
Target date
16 May 2007
Decision date
12 Jun 2007
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Decision Issued
Reference
P/0865/07
Type
Full Planning Application
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
HA2 9BJ
Council
Received
21 Mar 2007
Validated
22 Mar 2007
Target date
16 May 2007
Decision date
12 Jun 2007
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Decision Issued
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Harrow portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 12 Jun 2007, delegated decision by AG Andeep Gill — 12 weeks from submission (4 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
21 Mar 2007
Application received
22 Mar 2007
Application validated
16 May 2007
Statutory target date
12 Jun 2007
Delegated decision: Refused · AG Andeep Gill
21 Mar 2007
Application received
22 Mar 2007
Application validated
16 May 2007
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
12 Jun 2007
Delegated decision: Refused · AG Andeep Gill

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.