Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasHarrowHarrow Weald wardP/1224/23
Planning application · Harrow

P/1224/23.

TURNPIDGEONS Oxhey Lane, Hatch End, Pinner, Harrow, HA5 4AL

Householder at TURNPIDGEONS Oxhey Lane, Hatch End, Pinner, Harrow, HA5 4AL, received 25 Apr 2023 — refused on 13 Mar 2024 (delegated, Cris Lancaster).

HarrowHarrow WealdHA5 4ALP/1224/23
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHarrow profile →
Refused
Outcome
13 Mar 2024
46 wks
Decision time
38 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
8
Documents
8 linked
0
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Harrow planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Installation of two 1.7m high entrance gates to front boundary

Reference
P/1224/23
Type
Householder
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
HA5 4AL
Council
Received
25 Apr 2023
Validated
2 May 2023
Target date
27 Jun 2023
Decision date
13 Mar 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Reference
P/1224/23
Type
Householder
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
HA5 4AL
Council
Received
25 Apr 2023
Validated
2 May 2023
Target date
27 Jun 2023
Decision date
13 Mar 2024
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decision Issued
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
Decision Notice
2 Feb 2024
Officer Report
18 Jan 2024
PL Application - Full Planning Permission - Redacted
2 May 2023
PL Location Plan
26 Apr 2023
PL Site Plan
26 Apr 2023
PL Combined Existing & Proposed Elevations
26 Apr 2023
PL Proposed Front Elevation
26 Apr 2023
PL Design & Access Statement
26 Apr 2023
Decision Notice
2 Feb 2024
Officer Report
18 Jan 2024
PL Application - Full Planning Permission - Redacted
2 May 2023
Show all 8 rows
PL Location Plan
26 Apr 2023
PL Site Plan
26 Apr 2023
PL Combined Existing & Proposed Elevations
26 Apr 2023
PL Proposed Front Elevation
26 Apr 2023
PL Design & Access Statement
26 Apr 2023

Documents open on the Harrow portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 13 Mar 2024, delegated decision by Cris Lancaster — 46 weeks from submission (38 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
25 Apr 2023
Application received
2 May 2023
Application validated
27 Jun 2023
Statutory target date
13 Mar 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Cris Lancaster
25 Apr 2023
Application received
2 May 2023
Application validated
27 Jun 2023
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
13 Mar 2024
Delegated decision: Refused · Cris Lancaster

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
- The proposed gates and piers would constitute inappropriate development that is considered to give rise to an unsympathetic and incongrous form of development which would cause harm to the openness of the Green Belt, and no very special circumstances have been identified that would outweigh that harm and would fail to respect the character and appearance of the local area contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework (2023), policies G2 and D3 of The London Plan (2021), policies CS1.B and CS1.F of the Harrow Core Strategy (2012), policies DM1 and DM16 of the Development Management Policies Local Plan 2013.
1
- The proposed gates and piers would constitute inappropriate development that is considered to give rise to an unsympathetic and incongrous form of development which would cause harm to the openness of the Green Belt, and no very special circumstances have been identified that would outweigh that harm and would fail to respect the character and appearance of the local area contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework (2023), policies G2 and D3 of The London Plan (2021), policies CS1.B and CS1.F of the Harrow Core Strategy (2012), policies DM1 and DM16 of the Development Management Policies Local Plan 2013.
Policies cited
G2D3DM1DM16NPPF

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
Objections
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.