Planning Atlas
Planning Atlas›Harrow›…Pinner wardHA5 3HQBLUE BUTTERFLY MONTESSORI PRE SCHOOL, 5 Barrow Point Avenue, Pinner, Harrow, HA5 3HQ›P/3201/15
Planning application · Harrow

P/3201/15.

BLUE BUTTERFLY MONTESSORI PRE SCHOOL, 5 Barrow Point Avenue, Pinner, Harrow, HA5 3HQ

Full / Other Planning at BLUE BUTTERFLY MONTESSORI PRE SCHOOL, 5 Barrow Point Avenue, Pinner, Harrow, HA5 3HQ, received 3 Jul 2015 — approved on 6 Oct 2015 (delegated, DB David Buckley).

Harrow›Pinner›HA5 3HQ›P/3201/15
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationHarrow profile →
Approved
Outcome
6 Oct 2015
14 wks
Decision time
6 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
40
Documents
40 linked
—
Objections
not captured
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Harrow planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

First floor rear extension; installation of external fire escape spiral staircase at rear; installation of sliding entrance gates and railings onto existing front boundary wall; bin store; external alterations

Reference
P/3201/15
Type
Full Planning Application
Site
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
3 Jul 2015
Validated
21 Jul 2015
Target date
10 Sep 2015
Decision date
6 Oct 2015
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Decision Issued
Premises record
Council register
Reference
P/3201/15
Type
Full Planning Application
Site
Show all 17 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
3 Jul 2015
Validated
21 Jul 2015
Target date
10 Sep 2015
Decision date
6 Oct 2015
Decision route
Not recorded
Status
Decision Issued
Premises record
Council register
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
DECISION NOTICE dfugra
6 Oct 2015
APPAGE COMMITTEE NOTIFICATION
21 Sept 2015
Web Comment Public
17 Aug 2015
PL Application Incoming Letter of Objection - Redacted
17 Aug 2015
PL Application Incoming Letter of Objection - Redacted
17 Aug 2015
PL Application Incoming Letter of Objection - Redacted
17 Aug 2015
PL Application Incoming Letter of Objection - Redacted
14 Aug 2015
PL Application Incoming Letter of Objection - Redacted
14 Aug 2015
PL Application Incoming Letter of Objection - Redacted
14 Aug 2015
PL Application Incoming Letter of Objection - Redacted
13 Aug 2015
DECISION NOTICE dfugra
6 Oct 2015
APPAGE COMMITTEE NOTIFICATION
21 Sept 2015
Web Comment Public
17 Aug 2015
Show all 10 rows
PL Application Incoming Letter of Objection - Redacted
17 Aug 2015
PL Application Incoming Letter of Objection - Redacted
17 Aug 2015
PL Application Incoming Letter of Objection - Redacted
17 Aug 2015
PL Application Incoming Letter of Objection - Redacted
14 Aug 2015
PL Application Incoming Letter of Objection - Redacted
14 Aug 2015
PL Application Incoming Letter of Objection - Redacted
14 Aug 2015
PL Application Incoming Letter of Objection - Redacted
13 Aug 2015

Documents open on the Harrow portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Approved on 6 Oct 2015, delegated decision by DB David Buckley — 14 weeks from submission (6 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
3 Jul 2015
Application received
21 Jul 2015
Application validated
10 Sep 2015
Statutory target date
6 Oct 2015
Delegated decision: Approved · DB David Buckley
3 Jul 2015
Application received
21 Jul 2015
Application validated
10 Sep 2015
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
6 Oct 2015
Delegated decision: Approved · DB David Buckley

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.